7 Law Firms That Moved the Needle on Innovation in 2017
Yes, innovation is a tired buzzword and a law firm marketing cliché. But it's also the key to law firms remaining competitive.
December 28, 2017 at 04:05 PM
5 minute read
Yes, innovation is a tired buzzword and a law firm marketing cliché. But it's also the key to law firms remaining competitive in the face of increased client demands, intensifying competition and ever-greater segmentation of the legal services market. Throughout 2017, we've brought you stories of law firms investing in technology, implementing new systems or launching other future-minded experiments. Here are some of the headlines that stood out.
Every other year the firm invites associates to the Bryan Cave Business Academy, an event that's part training retreat and part hackathon. The goal is to get associates thinking about how technology is reshaping the Big Law business model and to urge the younger lawyers to propose new technology applications.
➤ Culhane Meadows — Stay-at-Home-Rainmakers: A Growing Threat to Big Law
The virtual law firm is attracting real talent with a model that allows lawyers to set their own billing rates and keep 80 percent of their earnings. Founded in 2013 by four lawyers in Dallas and Atlanta, the firm announced Dec. 19 that five new IP partners have joined its ranks. For a contrarian's view of cloud-based law firms, read Roy Strom's take in The Law Firm Disrupted.
➤ Dentons — CEO Shift at Nextlaw Labs Points to New Structure for Denton's Innovation Arm
Dentons continues to set the pace for law firm investment in legal technology through its Silicon Valley accelerator, Nextlaw Labs. This summer Dentons was recognized with an International Law Firm Innovation Award from Law.com affiliate Legal Week for its free lawyer referral program that provides clients with access to more than 21,000 attorneys.
➤ DLA Piper — Inside DLA Pipers Client Retention Data Analytics Program
At this year's ILTACON, a conference put on by the International Legal Technology Association, DLA Piper pulled back the curtain on how it's been using data analytics to improve client service and retention. The initiative used four years of firm data to learn more about client retention and predict simple steps that would likely lead to growth in a client's business. The project resulted in a four-prong plan for keeping clients happy and spending.
➤ Pierce Sergenian — New Boutique Touts Litigation Finance Deal to Fund Big Law Battles
Just months into its existence, Los Angeles-based litigation boutique Pierce Sergenian broadcast a deal with litigation financier Pravati Capital that would allow the tiny, upstart firm to take on potentially lucrative contingency fee cases against deep-pocketed adversaries. The deal, reporter Roy Strom noted, showed “how litigation finance may change the prevailing law firm business model by lowering the cost and risk associated with launching a new firm to take plaintiff-side cases on contingency.” Firm founder John Pierce, a Quinn Emanuel alum, said of going public: It “was important for the market to understand that we have the ability to take a case across the finish line.”
➤ Seyfarth Shaw — Seyfarth Shaw Puts 'Software Robots' to Use in Automation Push
The firm struck a licensing deal in February with Blue Prism, a software company that promises to automate repetitive tasks such as client onboarding and contract analysis.
“We believe it will help our people operate more efficiently and effectively in doing the things that attorneys want to do, and it will take a lot of the process and moving of data off their plate,” said Stephen Poor, Seyfarth's chairman emeritus. “It's not like robot lawyers sitting at their desks.”
➤ Simmons & Simmons — An Innovative Approach to Law Firm Innovation
The London-based law firm launched a new initiative that will allow its lawyers to apply for a break from hourly billing in order to pursue ideas that would help the firm modernize its business. Simmons lawyers will pitch their ideas to a committee and if selected, will be given time to work on their proposals. This addresses a dilemma for law firm partners who typically take a financial hit if they spend time on innovative projects.
Want more reporting on legal industry pressures and competition? Sign up here for The Law Firm Disrupted by Roy Strom. Each briefing offers a levelheaded discussion of trends rocking the legal sector, examines how industry leaders are coping, and offers insight on the tactics and strategies of would-be disrupters.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSolana Labs Co-Founder Allegedly Pocketed Ex-Wife’s ‘Millions of Dollars’ of Crypto Gains
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Paxton's 2024 Agenda: Immigration, Climate, Transgender Issues, Social Media, Abortion, Elections
- 2Let’s Hear It One Last Time!: One More Bow for 2024’s Litigators of the Week
- 3Bottoming Out or Merging Up? Law Firms That Shuttered in 2024
- 492 Nursing Homes, Left Out of NYS Funding for Ongoing Capital Expenses, File Federal Lawsuit
- 5Friday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250