The Big Law escape kit: the consultancy helping partners break away to launch boutiques
From Signature Litigation to Three Crowns, Kindleworth has developed a speciality in helping partners leave large firms to open high-end boutiques
January 02, 2018 at 05:16 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Globalisation and large-scale expansion can be glamorous and transformative for law firms, but what often gets drowned out in the excitement is that the process does not work for everyone.
The larger and more diverse a firm becomes, the more conflicts it is likely to generate, which can constrain the practices of individual partners, while others may see their practice areas marginalised as strategic priorities change. Not surprisingly, more new firms are being formed by teams spinning off from larger law firms.
But becoming an entrepreneur isn't easy. In a sign of how well-trodden this particular path has become, there is now at least one speciality consultancy helping boutique founders get their new firms up and running.
Kindleworth, which was established in 2011 by a group of four senior non-lawyer professionals at Olswang, including former COO Kevin Munslow, has carved out a successful niche advising high-end law firm startups.
Fellow co-founder James Hacking, Olswang's former head of operations, says the group's initial intention was to offer multidisciplinary consulting to law firms. But that plan changed after a chance meeting with Graham Huntley, a senior litigation partner at Hogan Lovells. His practice had been severely impacted by conflicts thrown up by that firm's transatlantic combination in 2010, so he decided to open a firm – Signature Litigation – with fellow litigation partner Helen Brannigan.
Kindleworth handled everything, from structuring the business and obtaining regulatory approval, right down to finding office space and arranging banking services.
It has proved a highly effective proposition. Word-of-mouth referrals led to roles on other successful startups, including Three Crowns, an arbitration boutique launched by three partners from Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, and ARC Pensions, founded by a former Mayer Brown partner and the ex-senior partner of Pinsent Masons.
"Leaving the safety net of a big, established brand is a nerve-wracking experience for partners, but the fact that we now have a track record [of successful spinoffs] really helps reassure people," Hacking says. "Partners initially don't really understand why they need us, as they've never launched a new business before. But they soon realise that even if they did have the necessary experience to do so, they're so busy with their practice that they simply don't have the time."
But the real genius behind Kindleworth's business model is that its involvement with its clients doesn't end once the new firms open their doors: It continues to provide ongoing business support services, seconding staff who work directly from the client's offices. While the initial spinoff work is typically handled on a fixed fee, these retainer arrangements provide a more consistent source of revenue.
Several Kindleworth partners even retain senior management positions at their clients: Hacking is COO at Three Crowns; Munslow is CEO at Signature; and partner John Skelton is the financial director at ARC.
Kindleworth is now developing a new line of business helping spinoff firms secure working and even pre-launch capital – something that has typically come out of the founding partners' own pockets. It is also considering relationships with headhunters who would refer partners to Kindleworth, so that they can consider establishing their own business, rather then undertaking a lateral move.
As a business that feeds on disruption, Hacking sees the current uncertainty in the legal industry as an opportunity. "For us, change is a great thing," Hacking says. "When we first started, it was quite a new thing for leading partners to set up their own businesses. Now, there's a growing realisation that there are viable alternatives to Big Law. We like to think that we are contributing to that process."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for US's Hardline Approach to Region
BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readDemocratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250