2017 Law Grads Provided $82 Million in Pro Bono Work
A survey from the Association of American Law Schools assigns each volunteered hour with a $24.14 value.
January 05, 2018 at 11:52 AM
3 minute read
Law students who graduated in 2017 performed more than 3.39 million hours of pro bono work while on campus, which equates to nearly $82 million in free legal services.
A newly released survey by the Association of American Law Schools found that on average, recent law graduates logged 184 hours of pro bono service over the course of their studies. That includes time spent in law school clinics, in externships with legal service providers, and through student organizations and volunteer opportunities.
“The numbers are really impressive,” said Wendy Perdue, dean of the University of Richmond School of Law and the incoming president of the Association of American Law Schools. “It's a story I think many communities don't fully appreciate. I'm not sure university boards and presidents appreciate the services that their law students are providing. I'm enormously proud of my school and my fellow schools for adding to access to justice.”
The students themselves benefit from pro bono work by building skills and laying the foundation for successful careers, Perdue added.
The actual cumulative number of pro bono hours performed by recent law graduates is likely much larger. The 2017 survey was based on responses from just 94 of the 205 American Bar Association-accredited law schools, and it only includes time logged by juris doctor students. It excludes pro bono work performed by LL.M. students.
The association launched the pro bono survey in 2016 as a way to quantify the public service impact of law students nationwide and illustrate the positive impact legal education has on society.
The inaugural survey found that the class of 2016 completed more than 2.2 million hours of pro bono work, for an estimated value of $52 million. That finding was based on responses from 80 schools. The survey assigns each pro bono hour with a $24.14 value, a coalition of nonprofit organizations called Independent Sector.
It appears that the amount of pro bono service students assume is rising. The 184 average among the class of 2017 represents a 60-hour increase over the class of 2016—or 20 additional hours per year on campus.
There has been no shortage of opportunities for current law students and recent graduates to assist those who may not be able to afford a lawyer. Among the initiatives highlighted by the association are the College of William and Mary Marshall-Wythe School of Law's Election Day VOTEline, a voter assistance hotline; New York University School of Law's Policing Project, which seeks to improve policing through greater accountability; and Baylor University School of Law's Texas Legal Answers project, where students answer legal questions submitted via a website by low-income residents.
This fall, law students on numerous campuses helped those with status under Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program apply for extensions after the U.S. Department of Justice in September announced the repeal of the program that allows them to remain in the country.
A rash of hurricanes in Texas, Florida, and Puerto Rico also created opportunities for law students to assist. At Columbia Law School, a group of students created the Legal Corps for Puerto Rico—a network of volunteer attorneys who aim to assist people on the storm-ravaged Caribbean island navigate the bureaucracy of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, filing for unemployment or housing assistance, and other legal obstacles.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250