Freshfields to appoint oversight committee for new lockstep as partners prepare to learn fate
Partners braced for pay decisions after lockstep changes voted through last year
January 10, 2018 at 08:44 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer is set to appoint a committee of partners to oversee the magic circle firm's impending lockstep shake-up.
Between six and eight partners will be appointed to the so-called 'Gates' committee, which will oversee decisions made by practice heads and regional heads about partners' progress through the firm's new lockstep.
The appointments will be made in the coming weeks, ahead of the new lockstep coming into effect on 1 May – a move that will see every partner in the firm assessed and repositioned on a new extended ladder that runs from 12-60 points, with gates at 22, 30 and 40 points.
The new ladder is intended to make it easier for the firm to monitor progress and free up points to better reward star performers, and should bring pay for a handful of top earners to more than £3m.
Former partners suggest that a number of partners with less profitable practices have already been warned that they face cuts to their remuneration as part of the overhaul, with exits expected as a consequence.
The majority of partners will receive fewer points on the new rebased ladder; however, for most, any reduction in points will be balanced out by the increased value of a point on the new ladder compared to the old, which ran from 17.5 to 50 points, with a second tier ladder running from 10 to 30 points in less profitable jurisdictions.
With only a handful of exceptional partners to be allowed through the final 40-point gateway, some of those partners currently sitting at top of the lockstep are expected to see remuneration cut, however.
One partner said: "People are being asked to move down based on practice areas and offices. Nobody has been moved down yet, but people have had some indication as to what the potential outcomes might be."
One former partner said the introduction of the oversight committee was the "logical direction of travel".
"If you want a more flexible and responsive compensation system, you need people who will evaluate your contribution on an ongoing basis," they said.
The committee will only normally get involved when partners reach a gateway, as progress between the gates should continue as standard each year.
One former partner said: "The maths means that if everyone goes down in points by 20%, given that the number who go into super points will be minimal, it shouldn't have a significant impact on general remuneration as the value per point should increase."
However, they added that the move "hadn't been met with universal joy and laughter" and that "you may see some CVs appear on the market" as a result.
Freshfields declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Under Fire for Human Rights Assessment of Saudi Arabia World Cup Bid
5 minute readThe Week in Data Nov. 7: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Trump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Trending Stories
- 1Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Offices & Dragons
- 2Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 3Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
- 4Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 5Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250