Arm Holdings kicks off first panel review since £24bn Softbank takeover
Smartphone microchip maker reviews advisers with DLA Piper, Mayer Brown and Bird & Bird in the spotlight
January 23, 2018 at 08:41 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Arm Holdings has begun a review of its legal panel, with DLA Piper, Mayer Brown and Bird & Bird among the firms under scrutiny.
The review comes after the UK technology company's £24bn takeover by Japanese telecoms giant Softbank in July 2016.
The microchip maker put together its first formal panel in 2015, with firms appointed for two-year terms. That line-up comprised DLA Piper, Eversheds Sutherland, Mayer Brown, Bird & Bird, Fieldfisher, Mills & Reeve, Fenwick & West, Winston & Strawn, Wiley Rein and Shanghai's Martin Hu & Partners.
DLA and Mayer Brown were appointed to advise on global corporate and M&A matters, with Fieldfisher brought in for data protection and technology work.
Since the establishment of the panel, ARM has turned to other firms to advise on specific issues. White & Case has been brought in to advise on US government matters, while Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati has been handling US antitrust work.
The company also has a relationship with Chinese firm Zhong Lun, and uses US firm McGuireWoods for litigation work.
Ahead of the full review, at least one firm has already been reappointed – Eversheds Sutherland, which handles employment and HR issues for the company.
It is expected that the number of primary advisers on the panel will stay at around 10.
Arm general counsel Carolyn Herzog said: "We are reviewing potential expansion of firms in areas where we have some expanded needs, to ensure we cover potential conflicts – such as M&A and litigation – and where we have growth needs, such as data privacy.
"There are also some current niche needs, such as US government work, and possible future niche areas where we may consider going off-panel to cover such work."
Although the review will focus on law firm rates and service offerings, it will also consider firms' commitment to diversity. Arm has also been assessing how much work each of the advisers have done for the company during the past two years, and establishing what value it has getting from the firms, and vice versa.
Herzog said: "We are are going through a list internally of which firms we want to participate. We have started having discussions with some firms, but we will be reaching out to a few others to participate in a proposal process as well."
The review is being run by director of legal operations Struan Britland. The company's legal team is led by Herzog, who joined in January 2017. She oversees an in-house legal team of around 70 lawyers and support staff based across the UK and the US.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Puts Beat Down on Ex-Wrestling CEO Vince McMahon for Not Reporting Settlements
3 minute readAfter Solving Problems for Presidents, Ron Klain Now Applying Legal Prowess to Helping Airbnb Overturn NYC Ban
7 minute readBig Company Insiders See Tech-Related Disputes Teed Up for 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Church of Scientology Set to Depose Phila. Attorney in Sexual Abuse Case
- 2An AG Just Specified How AI Could Get You in Hot Water
- 3Supreme Court Appears to Lean Toward Letting TikTok Ban Take Effect
- 4Standing Spat: Split 2nd Circuit Lets Challenge to Pfizer Diversity Program Proceed
- 5Judge Jablonski and Chief Justice Rabner Both Acted Completely Properly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250