Revealed: Berwin Leighton Paisner's longstanding links to disgraced Presidents Club charity
Accounts reveal firm served as legal adviser to scandal-hit charity with senior disputes partner a committee member
January 26, 2018 at 09:59 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) was listed as the principal legal adviser to the infamous Presidents Club Charitable Trust for at least five years, according to the organisation's accounts, it has emerged. The news came after an event brochure published online yesterday (25 January) revealed that disputes partner Graham Shear this year served as a committee member for the charity.
The UK top 20 law firm was listed as the charity's solicitors on all of its most recent annual accounts filed with the Charity Commission for the five years from 2011-12 to 2015-16. Coutts & Co was listed as the charity's banker, with City accountancy firm Carter Backer Winter providing audit services.
The scandal, which has brought an end to the charity, broke earlier this week after a report by an undercover Financial Times journalist told of hostesses at the annual dinner being subjected to "groping, lewd comments" and "repeated requests" to join attendees in bedrooms at London's Dorchester hotel.
On the seating plan for the the now infamous event, Shear – BLP's international commercial disputes head – was assigned a seat on a table hosted by Presidents Club co-chair David Meller. The event brochure, posted online by The Guardian, also lists Shear among seven individuals on the organising committee.
Shear has been at BLP since 2009, when he joined from City firm Teacher Stern. He has advised a raft of celebrity clients, including popstars Robbie Williams and Rita Ora and England and Arsenal footballer Ashley Cole. In 2013, he led a BLP team which advised Welsh footballer Gareth Bale on his record-setting €100m transfer from Tottenham Hotspur to Real Madrid.
In a statement issued days after BLP was contacted for comment, the firm denied that it was the charity's principal legal adviser, despite the account filings.
It declined to provide further details but said: "BLP is not, as incorrectly stated in The Presidents Club Trustees' Annual Report, The Presidents Club's principal legal advisers. We have done occasional pieces of work for this charity on a pro bono basis, as we do for a number of other registered charities.
"An extensive review of all the firm's associations, including those related to charity, is now being undertaken to ensure that in the future the firm's diversity and other values are reflected in the choices made by all partners and others involved with the firm.
"Our partner Graham Shear is extremely embarrassed and deeply regrets his attendance and any association with the dinner and apologises unreservedly."
The Presidents Club brochure welcome address, written by joint chairs Meller and Bruce Ritchie, states that despite a "strange" year, which has seen "Trump & Weinstein dominate the front pages" the Presidents Club "remains a constant" and has "successfully managed to withstand all the uncertainties of our times".
In the wake of the Financial Times report and the ensuing fallout, the charity has announced that it will close down, saying in a statement: "The trustees have decided that the Presidents Club will not host any further fundraisings events."
Other lawyers to have attended the event include Mishcon de Reya real estate partner Nick Minkoff, Kingsley Napley real estate consultant Francis Weaver and Fried Frank London corporate and private equity partner Dan Oates.
There is no suggestion that any of these lawyers were involved in any inappropriate behaviour.
In a statement, a Mishcon spokesperson said that Minkoff was "embarrassed" at being associated with the event and added that though he did not witness any of the behaviour reported, he did not dispute it.
A Fried Frank spokesperson said: "Dan did not attend the dinner and left shortly after arriving. Dan and Fried Frank are appalled by, and completely disassociate themselves from, the reported behaviour."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNewly Formed DEI Practices Expect Heightened Demand During Trump Administration
Transgender Woman Awarded $150K Default Judgment Against Corrections Officer for Alleged Assault
Settlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readJudicial Nominee Says Criminal Defense Background Will Bring Diverse Ideas to State Appellate Court
Trending Stories
- 1Weil Advances 18 to Partner, Largest Class Since 2021
- 2People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
- 3Beef Between Two South Florida Law Firms Deepens With Suit Over Defamation
- 4Judge Skips Over Sanctions in Talc Bankruptcy: 'That’s A No'
- 5Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250