Bird & Bird LLP accounts reveal 20% hike in management pay as half-year revenue grows 6.4%
The firm's management team was paid out €5.5m in the last financial year
January 30, 2018 at 05:42 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Bird & Bird's eight-strong management team received a 20% pay boost in 2016-17, the firm's limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts have revealed.
The firm, which reports its financial results in euros, paid its management committee €5.5m (£4.85m) during the year ended 30 April 2017, up from €4.6m (£4m) the previous year.
Bird & Bird has also announced its half-year results for the six months to 31 October 2017, stating that turnover rose by 6.4% to €177m (£156m). Profit before tax also grew 6.8% to €52m (£46m).
Meanwhile, the 2016-16 LLP results reveal that the firm's highest paid member took home 13% more in pay than the year previously – €1.08m (£953,000), up from €962,000 (£848,000).
The firm had revenue of €361m (£318m) in 2016-17, up 5% from the previous year's total of €343.8m (£302m). Profit before members' remuneration also increased by 9% to €103.5m (£91m).
Staff costs at the firm increased slightly from €159m (£140m) to €162m (£142m), while its average number of staff members grew from 974 to 995.
The accounts also revealed that Bird & Bird Services Limited, the holding company for the LLP's employees, spent £352,000 buying back its intellectual property and trademarks from Aves Brands, an IP consultancy that the firm launched in 2013.
The firm launched the spin-off in 2013 and reacquired it from Aves Enterprises in the summer of 2016.
Bird & Bird chief executive David Kerr (pictured top) told Legal Week: "All of our practices and geographies performed well over the year. Our offering is quite global so we don't think we were as impacted by Brexit as firms with bigger UK bases. There was a slight dip in corporate work immediately after the Brexit vote, but the pound falling in value offset that."
Kerr added: "We're on track to continue the growth we've seen during that half-year period. We will see the benefits of the substantial growth we've had across the world."
In November, Bird & Bird entered an agreement with Chinese firm AllBright Law Offices that will see the Chinese firm open an office at Bird & Bird's premises at 12 New Fetter Lane. It is expected to open in March.
AllBright posted revenue of $272.5m (£205.7m) in 2016, placing the firm in fifth place in The American Lawyer's China top 40. Its firmwide lawyer count that year was 1,661.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Clifford Chance Under Fire for Human Rights Assessment of Saudi Arabia World Cup Bid
5 minute read
The Week in Data Nov. 7: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Trump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Trending Stories
- 1A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 2Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 3State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
- 4Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
- 5Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
