For CIOs, Integrating IT Into Law Firm Business Culture Is Key to Change
At a Legalweek 2018 session, law firm CIOs explain why bringing IT staff closer into the law firm's business can spur change.
January 30, 2018 at 06:07 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
A law firm's efforts to become a technology-enabled and efficiency-focused business require a lot of moving parts. And none of them is more important than its IT department. At the “Leadership for IT” session at Legalweek 2018 conference in New York, law firm CIOs explained how bringing the IT teams closer into law firm business and culture is essential to any successful change management effort.
And a law firm that is looking to leverage technology and bring efficient services in-house will force all its internal teams to embrace change. “The change is as constant for attorneys as it is for [the IT department],” said Rob Kerr, CIO at Cooley, “We're constantly making changes to the systems they are using, and we have to find ways to better enable them.”
However, internal teams differ in their ability to weather such change. Whereas lawyers are known for being change-resistant, it is a far different story with IT staff. “If you're in IT and you're afraid of change, you're probably in the wrong industry,” said Brett Don, CIO at Stradley Ronon.
This disconnect between IT and a law firm's attorneys means that any change effort cannot solely be led by IT and forced upon attorneys. Instead, Kerr noted, it must be the result of a collaboration between the two groups.
But in order for IT to better collaborate and with attorneys, they first need to understand how attorneys work and why the law firm is looking to upend current workflows and technology. It is pivotal, therefore, to educate IT staff on “on these legal market demands we are seeing,” Don said. “IT sometimes get lost in their own world there and don't realize what is going on in the legal market in general.”
One way Stradley Ronon does that, he added, is through “constantly having discussions about the pressure law firms face from the clients” with their IT staff.
“We'll have customer meetings. We'll go out and meet with the leadership of a practice group or administration of a department to really understand what's going on,” he said.
Not only does understanding why change is needed give IT staff more appreciation for how their works ties into the work attorneys are doing, but it also allows them to understand the end-goal for any change management efforts.
At the end of the day, “It's not about technology. It's about business,” said Doug Caddell, CIO at Mayer Brown. He added that the IT department's goal is not to just install new technology but to enable attorneys to better do their job.
But getting a law firm IT staff to understand their business role means changing the culture of how IT departments work. For law firms looking to bolster their efficiency efforts, CIOs are advised to push their IT teams to interact with the law firm business in unprecedented ways.
Andrea Markstrom, CIO at Blank Rome, noted that her firm is making sure her team is brought into conversations with clients. “If I'm at the table with the law firm's client and if I understand what they need, that's a great outcome right there.”
What's more, Markstrom noted that her firm changed their IT “Help Desk” to a “Service Desk,” which sees staff getting out “from behind the desk and doing floor support.”
For Kerr, one-on-one interaction is important for better integrating IT into his law firm's business and culture. “We've put things in place like tech lounges,” which are essentially “open forums loosely modeled on the Apples 'Genius bar,'” he said.
Initially however, such a change was resisted by the firm's IT team. Kerr noted that there was pushback from staff who complained that they were too busy with projects to interact with attorneys directly. But Kerr was unfazed. “The notion that you are too busy to talk to your customers is not right.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Company Insiders See Tech-Related Disputes Teed Up for 2025
Legal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1U.S. Supreme Court Has No Jurisdiction Over Trump's New York Criminal Case: Prosecutors
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: With KPMG's Proposed Entry, Arizona's Liberalized Legal Market is Getting Interesting
- 3Womble Bond Dickinson Adds New Leaders as Merger Is Completed
- 4Family's Disability Discrimination Suit Cleared to Go Forward Against Six Flags
- 5Turning Over Legal Tedium to AI Requires Lots of Unglamorous Work on Front End
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250