What's Next: Is Blockchain Over-Hyped? | Legal Ethics, Meet Legal Tech | Smart Sex Contracts
The head of Cardozo's Blockchain Project talks about why smart contracts can create meaningful change for the legal profession. Also, why using technology may be required by legal ethics, and the perils of "sex contracts."
January 30, 2018 at 06:00 PM
4 minute read
Hello and welcome to What's Next. #Legalweek18 tweet [email protected] @benghancock ➤➤ Want to get What's Next by email? Sign up here.
|
Watch This Space: The Smart Contracts Are Coming
writing about the Cardozo Law School's Blockchain Project I took the opportunity to catch up with the director of the project, Aaron Wright, and learn a little more about his work. In a special edition of my Unprecedented podcast, Wright tells me "Like all hype, there's a grain of truth in it.” really for the first time in quite a while—we have the opportunity to reflect and think about how we engage in commerce, going to force lawyers to think about how they actually construct their commercial relationships, for their clients and for society at large.” Listen to the full interview here Apple Podcasts Google Play Libsyn >> Think Ahead: Steven Johnson's recent article The New York Times Magazine
|
On the Radar: 3 Things to Know
1. Sunday was Data Privacy Day. Facebook celebrated by giving users more of a glimpse at how their data is used—and an additional degree of control. Facebook is launching push videos into users' news feeds with information about how they can manage their privacy not everyone wants to share everything with everyone–including with us >> Takeaway: TechCrunch's Natasha Lomas 2. Japan was one of the first governments to embrace cryptocurrency. Now it's turning a sharp eye to crypto exchanges. local authorities said Monday they would investigate all cryptocurrency exchanges in the country Reuters reports contrasting sharply with crackdowns in South Korea and China,” it adds. 3. The Securities and Exchange Commission is not letting up any time soon on ICOs. First PlexCoin, then Munchee, now AriseBank. announced AriseBank falsely stated that it purchased an FDIC-insured bank, enabling customers the ability to obtain VISA cards to spend any of the many hundreds of cryptocurrencies >> Think Ahead: eyeing professionals
“My caution in using this term is that it brings to mind Skynet.”
— Catherine Krow of Directory Legal talking at Legalweek's workshop on “The Foundation of AI and Machine Learning” about her aversion to saying “artificial intelligence.” Check out my Twitter thread from the panel to get some of the highlights.
|
In Futuro: Robolawyer Ethics
Martin Tully, who just formed the tech-focused Actuate Law HB Gordon, who manages e-discovery at Teva Pharmaceuticals
|
Dose of Dystopia
had about the same reaction a software tool that purports to memorialize consent for sex building out a tool to more efficiently process low-level criminal offenders “My concern is that explicit consent, memorialized by blockchain, creates a period of time when consent cannot functionally be revoked. Women have a hard enough time 'proving' date rape as it is. What police officer (much less stupid freaking JURY) is going to hold a man responsible if he's holding a smart contract in his hand?” He sums up:
Thanks for reading, and keep plugged in with What's Next.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat's Next: Judge to Quash Twitter Subpoena | SCOTUS Won't Review Trial Ban
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250