New pricing strategy drives significant revenue boost at Hogan Lovells
The firm's pricing team delivered a 5.2% increase in revenue per litigator following adoption of new strategy
February 01, 2018 at 04:34 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
What's worse? Losing a great client over money? Or losing money over a great client?
Scott Green, the global chief operating and financial officer at 2,600-lawyer Hogan Lovells, said the firm addressed that conundrum with a client about two years ago, after it hired pricing expert Terry Williams, a former associate general counsel and deputy director of legal strategies at American International Group.
The client brought "a lot of honour to the firm", according to Green. But Hogan Lovells finally made it clear: "We cannot afford to work for you," Green said.
Eventually, with Williams' help, the firm renegotiated its rate agreement with the client, preserving and strengthening the relationship.
Green recalled: "We loved it so much that we were working for nothing. Then Terry came in and said: 'This just isn't fair to the firm.'"
New York-based Williams, whose formal title at the firm is global director of strategic pricing, started at Hogan Lovells in 2015. He has since installed a 10-member team – most with client-side legal department experience – that he expects to grow to 14 professionals by the end of 2018.
Williams said the leadership at Hogan Lovells has allowed him "to disturb some paradigms" in the firm's approach to client pricing. In his first year on the job, he travelled to many of the firm's 51 offices, explaining to the lawyers there what his team could do for them.
"We were kind of setting the brand of the pricing team and showing our abilities," Williams said. The two chief concepts that Williams sought to communicate were: First, "the price spectrum is very small" and, second, most fee negotiations hinge upon "the secondary needs you address with the clients", he said.
He and his team also have demonstrated the value of bringing rich, client-specific data to fee negotiations. Together, those efforts have led to "real increases in realised rates per hour and fair profits" at Hogan Lovells, according to Green, who previously worked for Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, and Pepper Hamilton.
Hogan Lovells has invested more deeply in a professional pricing group than many other law firms, although plenty of them have gone down that path, according to Daniel Ronesi, director of business-of-law consulting for Atlanta-based software solutions provider Aderant.
"I think it's definitely outside of the norm, even with as many lawyers as the firm has. It's a very robust pricing team for a law firm today," Ronesi said of Hogan Lovells' efforts.
Before Williams, Hogan Lovells "didn't have a very proactive pricing team", Green said. When negotiating with clients, the firm struggled to counter clients' statistics-based arguments about fees, which rarely supported raising the firm's compensation.
"Our clients seemed to have gotten ahead of us," Green recalled.
To gain leverage with clients, Williams' team develops data particular to each client that shows them the value they are getting from Hogan Lovells. The specifics may range from standard market rate breakdowns to efficiency savings projections; forecasting qualitative outcomes against projected risks; and client-specific historic legal hourly legal spend modelled against alternative fee proposals.
Dennis Tracey, head of litigation for the Americas at Hogan Lovells, says his department has established an ironclad rule: Any lawyer who wants to negotiate an alternative fee arrangement with a client "has to run it by Terry and his team", Tracey said.
Tracey calculates that, as a direct result of the pricing team's influence, his department's domestic litigation revenues per lawyer rose 5.2% in 2017. The firm has entered into alternative fee arrangements with several major clients that have agreed to give Hogan Lovells all their domestic litigation matters in exchange for negotiated flat fees, generating $34m (£24.2m) in revenue, Tracey said.
But Green said it's not just about smart pricing helping the firm secure a large volume of work. He said the pricing group has also given Hogan Lovells' lawyers more confidence to negotiate higher fees, even with their most cherished clients. Pre-Williams, he said, "we were afraid", but being able to harness data-driven strategies has changed that.
All of this has made Williams a popular figure at the firm. "When he comes into my office, we give Terry what he needs," Green said.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Kirkland Alums Land the Top GC Posts—Here's What It Means for Business Generation
10 minute readLaw Firms Funnel Millions to Congressional Races, Though Skew Toward Dems
4 minute readPartner Pay Transparency Is Eroding, Even if 'Black Box' Systems Haven't Caught On
6 minute readRecent Layoff/Callback Litigation Underscores Perils Employers Face From Every Direction
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250