Dentons ousts partner after investigation into claims of inappropriate behaviour
Former Maclays partner to leave after firm finds "behaviour fell well below expectations"
February 09, 2018 at 04:51 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Dentons partner who was suspended last month following allegations of inappropriate behaviour has left the firm.
Dentons launched an internal investigation in January, after learning of allegations made against the male partner while he was at Scottish firm Maclay Murray & Spens, which merged with Dentons in July last year.
A Dentons spokesperson said that while the investigation "found no evidence of sexual harassment", it did find that the "behaviour of the partner concerned fell well below the expectations that we have of our partners".
The partner was placed on a leave of absence throughout the investigation, with the firm saying that he would not return to the office while the investigation was carried out.
The spokesperson added: "Last month we became aware that reports of inappropriate behaviour were made against a Maclay Murray & Spens (MMS) partner about 15 months ago, more than a year before MMS's merger with Dentons. Immediately upon becoming aware of these reports, we launched an internal investigation and placed the partner on a leave of absence [...] We can confirm that he has now left the firm."
Legal Week understands that the employee that raised the complaint against the partner is still with the firm.
Earlier this week, Legal Week revealed that a Baker McKenzie partner at the centre of a sexual assault scandal is set to leave the firm. Bakers is facing scrutiny from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) over its handling of the alleged incident.
The partner is under investigation for allegedly assaulting a female associate, who received a payout from Bakers and entered into a confidentiality agreement before leaving. The firm has issued a public apology and admitted it should have done better in its handling of the episode.
Last year, Legal Week research found that nearly two thirds of female lawyers have experienced some form of sexual harassment while working at a law firm, with more than half experiencing it on more than one occasion. A number of female lawyers also spoke anonymously to Legal Week about their experiences of sexual harassment in the profession, following the research.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
How Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute read
People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
7 minute read
Newly Formed DEI Practices Expect Heightened Demand During Trump Administration
Transgender Woman Awarded $150K Default Judgment Against Corrections Officer for Alleged Assault
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
