Lions and Tigers Can Keep Their Claws, for Now, Thanks to Injunction
An animal charity in Indiana must stop declawing lions and tigers, and put an end to “Tiger Baby Playtimes,” which allowed the public to interact with big cat cubs.
February 13, 2018 at 03:47 PM
3 minute read
An animal charity in Indiana must stop declawing lions and tigers, and put an end to “Tiger Baby Playtimes,” which allowed the public to interact with big cat cubs.
The order comes from a preliminary injunction in a federal lawsuit by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, which alleged that Wildlife In Need, Wildlife in Deed Inc. and its managers, Timothy and Melisa Stark, violated the Endangered Species Act. PETA is asking the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana in New Albany, Indiana, to grant permanent injunctive relief.
The Feb. 12 preliminary injunction said PETA's evidence likely will prove the defendants were harming and harassing big cats. Wildlife in Need had been routinely declawing big cats—to make them easier to handle, not from medical necessity—even after a federal government agency directed the practice to stop. Declawing severs a bone, blood vessels, tendons and ligaments, and can cause permanent pain and lameness.
Wildlife in Need also was charging a $25 fee for “Tiger Baby Playtimes,” when the public could interact directly with cubs. Up to 35 people would spend 30 minutes in a room where the cubs played, and with back-to-back sessions each day, leaving only a one-hour break for the cubs. The practice stresses the cubs and adversely affects their behavior.
U.S. District Judge Richard L. Young noted in the preliminary injunction that the defendants were sanctioned for being unresponsive to discovery requests and court orders. The court decided the matter based largely on the plaintiff's evidence.
The court enjoined the defendants from declawing any big cats, using cubs under 18 months old in public encounters, including Tiger Baby Playtimes, or separating cubs from their mothers prematurely, during the pendency of the case. The defendants can ask for a court order if there's a medical necessity for declawing, or separating cubs from mothers.
“The court has done the right thing in stopping Wildlife in Need from tearing cubs away from their mothers for use as public playthings and amputating their toes, which can leave them with lifelong lameness, pain and psychological distress,” said Brittany Peet, PETA Foundation director of captive animal law enforcement, in a statement.
Corporate Counsel named PETA's legal department as one of the best in 2017 for landmark litigation that lead to the closure of the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus and stopped SeaWorld San Diego from expanding its orca tanks.
Richard Rush of Rush Law Office in New Albany, who represents the defendants, didn't immediately return a phone call seeking comment.
Angela Morris is a freelancer reporter. Follow her on Twitter @AMorrisReports.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250