Dealmaker: Stephenson Harwood's Flannery on taking silk, behavioural correctiveness and stilton on crumpets
Stephenson Harwood head of international arbitration and new QC Louis Flannery on some of his career highlights
February 19, 2018 at 05:09 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Stephenson Harwood head of international arbitration Louis Flannery will be appointed Queen's Counsel (QC) at a ceremony to be held later this month (26 February). He was among 119 new QCs to be announced in December and among five solicitor-advocates from private practice to make the grade.
Flannery joined Stephenson Harwood in 2008, having spent six years as an associate at legacy SJ Berwin.
Why did you become a litigator? Because I could not become a pilot.
What's the closest you have come to doing something other than law? Becoming a pilot.
Why work in a law firm rather than become a barrister? Teamwork.
Which judge or barrister do you most admire and why? Judge: dead, Lord Denning; and alive, too many to mention but if had to single out one it would be Lord Justice Hamblen – razor sharp, scrupulously fair and perfectly polite in court. Barrister: dead, Marshall Hall; and alive, Sydney Kentridge QC. Solicitor: dead, my stepfather Norman Shine; and alive, David Harrel the ex-senior partner of S J Berwin.
What is the most memorable moment of your career? Receiving the news at 4:02pm on 14 December that I had been approved to become one of Her Majesty's Counsel.
What's been your proudest professional moment/moment in court? Winning my first ever case to save a 66-year-old Turkish woman from being deported, as an articled clerk with one month's experience.
…and worst day on the job? Losing a case for a pro bono client.
What advice would you give to young litigators starting out? Everything. Repays. Careful. Reading. And don't come into the profession unless you are absolutely crazy about the law and can write properly. It's all so deadly serious now, and in these times of de-platforming and behavioural correctiveness, don't be fooled into thinking that it's a wonderful and noble profession. Billing, timesheets, feedback forms, systems, protocols, outsourcing, etc, are all conspiring against the beauty and majesty of the law and reducing the cohesiveness of the profession and its members.
What's the best/worst thing about being a litigator? One, the advocacy and two, the advocacy.
What's the funniest thing you've ever witnessed in court? Nothing in my experience to match anything from My Cousin Vinny. Courtrooms are, with the greatest respect, some of the most boring places on earth.
How do litigators differ from deal lawyers? Most like a good fight. And most know a bit (or a lot) more law.
How much do you conform to the spiky litigator stereotype? No idea.
What's the toughest ethical/moral dilemma your job has ever presented you with? Can I please plead the fifth on that one?
What most annoys you about the legal profession? The attempts made to stifle individuality.
What's your strongest characteristic…and worst trait? One, my individuality and two, my incontinence.
What's the worst corporate event you've ever attended? Too many to mention.
Most memorable case you ever have worked on and why? My first – see above. It was a victory against the machinery of state.
Do you see yourself having a career outside law? No, I have an amazing job leading a great team in a wonderful firm with superb people from top to bottom.
What's your favourite TV depiction of a litigation lawyer? Lionel Hutz.
What's your favourite item of clothing? My incontinence knickers.
What's your favourite cheese? Daft question because it depends on the time and place and mood but if had to choose one, it would be Paxton & Whitfield's stilton if served with fine tawny port and spread on toasted crumpets and in a room with a real fire and something decent to read (anything by Robert Harris).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Under Fire for Human Rights Assessment of Saudi Arabia World Cup Bid
5 minute readThe Week in Data Nov. 7: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Trump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250