What's Next: Autonomous Drones | Noise-Signal Over Crypto Regs | Waymo Hits the Road
New self-piloted drones confront an uncertain regulatory and liability landscape. Plus, will cryptocurrencies be subject to more stringent regulation?
February 20, 2018 at 07:58 PM
4 minute read
Hello and welcome to another week of What's Next [email protected] @benghancock. Sign up here |
Watch This Space: No Fly-Zone?
This takes selfie obsession to a whole other level. Farhad Manjoo's reporting on the Skydio R1 autonomous drone The self-piloted drone tracks its target with with what seems like uncanny determination. (Think floating CCTV camera.) serious regulatory hurdles write Wiley Rein attorneys Sara Baxenberg and Josh Turner does an autonomous drone know how to comply? “For instance, the R1 is designed to sense and avoid obstacles to stay trained on its subject, but can it tell when those obstacles are other people? If It can, can it then take the necessary steps to avoid flying over or too close to them? What about other aircraft?” liability questions akin to those presented by self-driving cars. Meanwhile, here's this for your consideration: autonomously fly to gunshot sites >> Bigger Picture:
|
Protocol: Signal and Noise On Crypto Rules
Hit me with it. • Noise: First, we had Rob Joyce—the White House's top cybersecurity official—telling folks in Munich that new crypto regs are not on the horizon. Cointelegraph • Signal: Cleary Gottlieb the heads of the SEC and CFTC in recent testimony to Congress have signaled they may want to stake out a stronger stance in regulating crypto • Signal: Financial Times three different categories of ICOs Bonus: Ars Technica FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel Twitter
“Clearly not, otherwise I wouldn't have done this.” Kathleen Breitman, co-founder of blockchain startup Tezos, after being asked whether she worries its crypto-asset will be deemed a security (Video on YouTube; story on ETH News). It's still unclear whether Tezos -- -- which raised a record-breaking $232 million in an ICO last year -- is under investigation. The SEC rejected a Florida lawyer's attempt to get related documents under the Freedom of Information Act.
|
On the Radar: Waymo Hits the Road In AZ
Quartz been issued a permit to operate as a “transportation network company” in Arizona It's not clear from the reporting yet how or whether Lyft will be involved in this new launch >> Context: The Verge |
Dose of Dystopia
Face Off facial recognition technology use by law enforcement—and it is not a pretty picture. “[T]he adoption of face recognition technologies like these is occurring without meaningful oversight , without proper accuracy testing of the systems as they are actually used in the field, and without the enactment of legal protections to prevent internal and external misuse. This has led to the development of unproven, inaccurate systems that will impinge on constitutional rights and disproportionately impact people of color .” signs the agency wants to suck up photos from social media and other sources it argues states should lead the way in legislating limits on the technology
Thanks for reading, and keep plugged in with What's Next.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat's Next: Judge to Quash Twitter Subpoena | SCOTUS Won't Review Trial Ban
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250