How Law Firms Are Innovating and Succeeding with Analytics: 4 Case Studies
Four real-world examples of law firms using analytics to drive business development and successful client outcomes.
February 22, 2018 at 11:49 AM
3 minute read
Last month, a survey revealed that 90 percent of Am Law 200 law firms feel legal analytics adds value to their practice. For 29 percent, it's “invaluable.” Among the benefits these firms cited are demonstrating expertise and competitive advantage to clients, determining legal strategies for particular courts and judges, predicting likely outcomes of legal strategies or arguments, and performing case assessments.
Perhaps even more interesting is the fact that these firms said clients are the primary driver of their practice's use of legal analytics technology.
So what are some real-world examples of law firms using analytics to drive business development, market position and successful client outcomes?
- DLA Piper earns $37.6 million in additional revenue through client retention. After realizing that 18 out of 20 of its “key partner” clients had flat or decreased revenue between 2016 and 2017, the team at DLA Piper looked to analytics to identify metrics influencing retention rates and improve lagging numbers. The firm dug into the differences between growing clients and shrinking clients, running 7 million records – 4 years' worth – through their program. In the end, the firm was able to prevent 85 percent of fee loss on a year-over year basis.
- Littler Mendelson tackles pay equity among corporate clients. The firm's Pay Equity Assessment Tool analyzes client data on employee compensation and demographics and looks for potential litigation risk given federal and state laws. The firm is then able to counsel clients on measures for compensation compliance – and champion for more equity – helping clients avoid costly matters.
- Hogan Lovells generates an extra $34 million in revenue with pricing intel. The firm's global director of strategic pricing, Terry Williams, has championed an effort to bring client-specific data to fee negotiations, which resulted in “real increases in realized rates per hour and fair profits,” according to Hogan Lovells' global chief operating and financial officer, Scott Green. The practice, along with other data-independent strategies, helped generate $34 million in revenues by negotiating flat-fee arrangements that retained and grew several key clients. That equaled a revenue increase per lawyer in domestic litigation of 5.2 percent.
- Drinker Biddle stops misconduct in its tracks. Last year, the national law firm used analytics to disprove a terminated executive's claims that the company was falsifying financial records. By being proactive and using relativity analytics on an internal investigation of the company, the firm was able to help its client save more than $270,000 in legal fees – and a potentially devastating court case.
From recruitment and retention to game-changing approaches that save clients time and money and keep reputations intact, law firms are implementing legal analytics in a variety of ways. Getting started is as simple as asking the question: What do we need to learn – and what problem do we need to fix?
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Week in Data Jan. 2: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Split 4th Circuit Revives Constitutional Challenge to Child Vaccine Mandate
Boxing Promoter Don King Hit With $3B Lawsuit Over Cancellation of 'Rumble in the Jungle 2'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Fearless Forecaster’s Employment Law Predictions for 2025
- 2Judicial Conference Declines Democratic Request to Refer Justice Thomas to DOJ
- 3People in the News—Jan. 2, 2025—Eastburn and Gray, Klehr Harrison
- 4Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 5Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250