Davis Polk and Freshfields win roles as Comcast challenges Murdoch with £22bn bid for Sky
Pair called up as US cable operator tops a rival bid from 21st Century Fox
February 27, 2018 at 04:53 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Davis Polk & Wardwell and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer have been instructed to advise on US cable operator Comcast's £22.1bn bid for Sky, which challenges an existing offer from 21st Century Fox.
Rupert Murdoch's 21st Century Fox had previously agreed a £18.5bn deal to buy the remaining 61% of Sky it does not already own.
Davis Polk is advising longstanding client Comcast with a team led by managing partner Tom Reid, which includes London corporate partner Will Pearce and New York corporate partner Brian Wolfe.
Freshfields is also representing Comcast with a team including London M&A partners Julian Long and Alison Smith, City competition partners John Davies and Michelle Davis and London employment partner Alice GreenwEll.
Comcast said today (27 February) that its potential all-cash offer would value Sky at £12.50 per share. This would be around 16% more than 21st Century Fox's initial £10.75 bid.
Sky is understood to have turned to HSF again on the new bid.
Previously, Legal Week reported that Allen & Overy (A&O) was instructed to advise longstanding client 21st Century Fox on its proposed deal announced in December 2016, leading on corporate, regulatory and competition matters. Its team is being led out of London by antitrust co-head Antonio Bavasso, corporate finance partner David Broadley and M&A partners Seth Jones and Simon Toms.
Skadden also won a role to advise 21st Century Fox on corporate matters with a team led by New York M&A partner Howard Ellin and Brandon Van Dyke. Simpson Thatcher Bartlett is advising on the financing aspects of the deal with a team including New York partner and global banking head Patrick Ryan and banking associate Matthew Farrell.
Picture credit: user Steindy
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court Asked If Ellison's Plans Affected Oracle's NetSuite Acquisition
3 minute read'London and Brussels Have Quickly Become Accretive for the Firm': Paul Weiss Enters Top 10 UK M&A Advisers
5 minute read'More Deals and Larger Deals': Big Law Dealmakers Weigh In on Rate Cut Impact
7 minute readGameStop CEO Fined $1M for Failing to Disclose Wells Fargo Investment
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250