Slaughters warned Carillion board about accounting disclosures last May, leaked minutes reveal
Magic circle firm advised that decision not to disclose accounting issues could attract 'very close scrutiny'
February 27, 2018 at 07:53 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Slaughter and May warned Carillion's directors about the implications of failing to disclose accounting issues as far back as last May, newly released board minutes have revealed.
In a meeting which took place on 9 May 2017, Slaughters corporate finance partner William Underhill – a longstanding adviser to Carillion – told the company's board that a decision not to disclose negative accruals across projects including the construction of Royal Liverpool Hospital and the redevelopment of Battersea Power Station would come under "very close scrutiny".
According to the board minutes, Underhill told directors that "if, going forward, a decision was taken that the accounts had to be restated, the decision not to announce would come under very close scrutiny", and that "protecting the share price was not a reason in itself".
The minutes, which were leaked to the parliamentary inquiry into the collapse by whistleblower and former Carillion finance director Emma Mercer, suggest that the construction company's directors were well aware of accounting issues that subsequently contributed to its collapse this January.
Company secretary and director of legal services Richard Tapp was also an attendee at the meeting, which was held via telephone and also included representatives from Carillion's banking advisers at Morgan Stanley.
Slaughters has been approached for evidence by the cross-party inquiry looking into the collapse of the construction giant, with the magic circle firm being asked to provide information relating to the "nature of the advice" it provided to Carillion and the period during which it provided that advice.
Former Carillion chairman Philip Green previously told the inquiry that the board "sought very strongly at Carillion to make sure that we had quality advice", adding that their advisers, including Slaughters, were "intimately" involved throughout the 12-18 months leading up to the company's collapse.
Slaughters has been asked if it agrees with Green's assessment of its involvement and whether the firm agrees that its advice was acted upon. The firm was given until 20 February to respond to the request for information, and it is understood that it replied within that timeframe.
Slaughters has a longstanding relationship with Carillion and is among a raft of firms advising on the fallout from the collapse. Underhill, who has a focus on securities issues and M&A, has been at Slaughters since 1981, and has worked with Carillion for many years, advising on projects such as the £800m British-Chinese joint venture to develop the 'Airport City' business district around Manchester Airport.
Slaughters declined to comment.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTopping Kirkland, Weil Won the Most Valuable Major Bankruptcy Retentions of 2024
Beyond Bordeaux’s Bankruptcy: A Lesson In Adapting to the Evolving Sports Media Landscape
6 minute readUS Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute readCleary vs. White & Case: NY Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy
Trending Stories
- 1‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 2State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 3Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
- 422-Count Indictment Is Just the Start of SCOTUSBlog Atty's Legal Problems, Experts Say
- 5Judge Rejects Walgreens' Contractual Dispute Against Founder's Family Member
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250