Is the Cloud the Solution to True Work-Life Balance for Lawyers?
Many law firms are still not taking full advantage of the cloud, but there are examples of leaders demonstrating the full benefit of the cloud, which includes more freedom for attorneys.
March 13, 2018 at 10:45 AM
5 minute read
There is an increasing drive for companies to provide more convenient, quick, and personalized services to the customer, while simultaneously simplifying the operating model and keeping costs at a minimum. To achieve this, there is an growing focus on capturing additional data, performing predictive analytics, and taking quick action, which necessitates companies to be agile and flexible in how they run their business. Moving to the cloud enables companies to be more adaptable to both the demands of the customer and the needs of the employee. The cloud enables a new way of operating, providing a realistic chance at attaining work-life balance, particularly in the legal industry.
The Cloud Can Mean Freedom
Moving to the cloud has several key benefits – chief among them are a reduced footprint (e.g. data centers, hardware), decreased need for maintenance and operations costs, and the ability to better align and easily adjust capacity needs, and flexibility. Culhane Meadows (see ABC News article) is a great example of a law firm that is leading with a cloud-first mentality, and consequently, their attorneys are working remotely without an actual office. This enables Culhane Meadows' attorneys to access everything necessary without a centralized, common physical location. This, in turn, results in bottom-line benefits – no occupancy expenses, artwork, furniture, or related overhead, which correlates directly to increased profitability. Additionally, the reduced cost structure offers increased flexibility in fee arrangements, and can be more appealing to the younger and emerging attorney population (or the uncommonly hip boomer attorney).
Unsurprisingly, Law Firms Are Behind
However, many law firms are still far from realizing the full potential of the cloud. According to ALM Intelligence's third annual cybersecurity survey (Legal Compass subscribers can click here for free access to the data), while 77% of law firms embrace cloud technology, the reality is that cloud adoption is fragmented at best (see Figure 1). While 55% of firms use the cloud for e-discovery related work, only 29% do so for e-mail, 22% for storage and 2% for billing. As a comparison, 88% of IT professionals use cloud-based services or apps, including 52% for e-mail and 38% for storage. Compounding the point of law firms lagging in cloud usage, Skyhigh analyzed cloud usage of over 30 million users globally (anonymously) and found that the legal industry uploads less than 4 TB of data each month to the cloud, whereas the leading industry, manufacturing, uploads 24.5 TB.
Further, a shocking 26% of law firms are not using any cloud-based storage services (Figure 2). The reasons for the low, slow and not full utilization of the cloud is predictable, though not entirely warranted. Top worries and challenges law firms have regarding the cloud are having less control over their data and security (Figure 3).
These worries, while shared by many organizations across industries, are not totally justified. While venturing outside the “four walls” of a law firm via the cloud, there certainly are many factors to consider: vendor management, shadow IT, business continuity, information management, cybersecurity and compliance. And, to the credit of law firms, initially navigating through each factor can be overwhelming. But, not “physically” having the data within the confines of the law firm does not mean loss of data control or a decrease in security measures. In fact, it's quite the opposite. Just as it makes the most sense to have a law firm and attorneys handle legal issues, cloud storage service companies offer expertise in data compliance, privacy and cybersecurity. Using the cloud also enhances the control and access firms have to data.
Take Measured Steps to the Cloud
Moving to the cloud and having a cloud first mentality is a drastic shift for most law firms, and certainly without a comprehensive cloud strategy, risk increases through cybersecurity vulnerabilities and compliance gaps. However, investing in a cloud strategy that aligns with the business strategy lays the groundwork for processes and guidelines for securely managing and operating in the cloud, and as a result, can provide the attorneys with more freedom. Even if the law firm keeps its brick and mortar office space, its attorneys will spend less time prepping, gathering, creating, and accessing documents, which will, in the least, offer a closer resemblance to work-life balance. There are, of course, other benefits to cloud adoption, such as greater scalability, better/faster access to technology, improved performance, improved business continuity and cost savings (see Figure 4), which should help build the case for greater investment in cloud among law firms.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-Big Law Partner's Boutique Has Both a New Name, Office
The Law Firm Disrupted: What Lawyers Will Go From Grunt to Great
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250