Is the Cloud the Solution to True Work-Life Balance for Lawyers?
Many law firms are still not taking full advantage of the cloud, but there are examples of leaders demonstrating the full benefit of the cloud, which includes more freedom for attorneys.
March 13, 2018 at 10:45 AM
5 minute read
There is an increasing drive for companies to provide more convenient, quick, and personalized services to the customer, while simultaneously simplifying the operating model and keeping costs at a minimum. To achieve this, there is an growing focus on capturing additional data, performing predictive analytics, and taking quick action, which necessitates companies to be agile and flexible in how they run their business. Moving to the cloud enables companies to be more adaptable to both the demands of the customer and the needs of the employee. The cloud enables a new way of operating, providing a realistic chance at attaining work-life balance, particularly in the legal industry.
The Cloud Can Mean Freedom
Moving to the cloud has several key benefits – chief among them are a reduced footprint (e.g. data centers, hardware), decreased need for maintenance and operations costs, and the ability to better align and easily adjust capacity needs, and flexibility. Culhane Meadows (see ABC News article) is a great example of a law firm that is leading with a cloud-first mentality, and consequently, their attorneys are working remotely without an actual office. This enables Culhane Meadows' attorneys to access everything necessary without a centralized, common physical location. This, in turn, results in bottom-line benefits – no occupancy expenses, artwork, furniture, or related overhead, which correlates directly to increased profitability. Additionally, the reduced cost structure offers increased flexibility in fee arrangements, and can be more appealing to the younger and emerging attorney population (or the uncommonly hip boomer attorney).
Unsurprisingly, Law Firms Are Behind
However, many law firms are still far from realizing the full potential of the cloud. According to ALM Intelligence's third annual cybersecurity survey (Legal Compass subscribers can click here for free access to the data), while 77% of law firms embrace cloud technology, the reality is that cloud adoption is fragmented at best (see Figure 1). While 55% of firms use the cloud for e-discovery related work, only 29% do so for e-mail, 22% for storage and 2% for billing. As a comparison, 88% of IT professionals use cloud-based services or apps, including 52% for e-mail and 38% for storage. Compounding the point of law firms lagging in cloud usage, Skyhigh analyzed cloud usage of over 30 million users globally (anonymously) and found that the legal industry uploads less than 4 TB of data each month to the cloud, whereas the leading industry, manufacturing, uploads 24.5 TB.
Further, a shocking 26% of law firms are not using any cloud-based storage services (Figure 2). The reasons for the low, slow and not full utilization of the cloud is predictable, though not entirely warranted. Top worries and challenges law firms have regarding the cloud are having less control over their data and security (Figure 3).
These worries, while shared by many organizations across industries, are not totally justified. While venturing outside the “four walls” of a law firm via the cloud, there certainly are many factors to consider: vendor management, shadow IT, business continuity, information management, cybersecurity and compliance. And, to the credit of law firms, initially navigating through each factor can be overwhelming. But, not “physically” having the data within the confines of the law firm does not mean loss of data control or a decrease in security measures. In fact, it's quite the opposite. Just as it makes the most sense to have a law firm and attorneys handle legal issues, cloud storage service companies offer expertise in data compliance, privacy and cybersecurity. Using the cloud also enhances the control and access firms have to data.
Take Measured Steps to the Cloud
Moving to the cloud and having a cloud first mentality is a drastic shift for most law firms, and certainly without a comprehensive cloud strategy, risk increases through cybersecurity vulnerabilities and compliance gaps. However, investing in a cloud strategy that aligns with the business strategy lays the groundwork for processes and guidelines for securely managing and operating in the cloud, and as a result, can provide the attorneys with more freedom. Even if the law firm keeps its brick and mortar office space, its attorneys will spend less time prepping, gathering, creating, and accessing documents, which will, in the least, offer a closer resemblance to work-life balance. There are, of course, other benefits to cloud adoption, such as greater scalability, better/faster access to technology, improved performance, improved business continuity and cost savings (see Figure 4), which should help build the case for greater investment in cloud among law firms.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250