Pinsents restructuring report sheds light on £1m cost savings from support staff shake-up
New report details thinking behind restructuring which resulted in 78 voluntary redundancies
March 13, 2018 at 10:07 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Pinsent Masons is set to make savings of more than £1m as a result its support staff restructuring last year, according to a new case study published by the firm's technology partner BigHand.
The report sheds light on the process carried out last year, which resulted in 78 voluntary redundancies after a consultation involving all of its UK legal PAs.
It states that the restructuring was motivated by a realisation that the firm's PAs were not being effectively utilised and were being overloaded with routine work. To address this, Pinsents invested in new technology to improve the way work was being doled out, with more tasks routed to the firm's legal outsourcing provider Exigent in South Africa.
The restructuring also involved the creation of a new layer of team administrators (TA), a role that all affected PAs were eligible to apply for.
While a significant number of Pinsents' 100 UK PAs took up the offer of voluntary redundancy, those moving into the TA roles now carry out administrative tasks such as scanning, filing and printing, while the more experienced PAs who have remained at the firm have been freed up to carry out more valuable, client-focused work. The firm now has 65 people in the TA role.
According to the report, this means that "the right people are doing the right level jobs at the right cost to the business", and that within two months, the number of jobs being sent to Exigent increased from 700 to 1,200, while the number of jobs now handled by TAs rose from 1,800 to 4,500 over three months.
It adds that while the key objective of the restructuring was "to improve internal service to the business and ensure PA expertise and skills were being effectively utilised", it has also delivered "significant financial benefits, with a direct recurring cost saving of £1.4m".
The firm confirmed that it expects to make savings of more than £1m in the first year under the new structure.
Pinsents head of PA and administration services Tara Layman explains: "While there were a large number of motivated, engaged, high-performing PAs who were actively looking for the value-added element of the role, there were others with the same job title who were just as busy but being utilised for more mundane tasks that did not tap into their skills, motivate them, provide job satisfaction or offer opportunities to grow."
Pinsents COO Alistair Mitchell added: "The biggest benefit of this project has been Pinsents' ability to focus on the continuing professional development of our TAs and PAs, ensuring their skillsets are used effectively, improving motivation and job satisfaction.
"While we do not charge for PA and admin services, this lower cost, more efficient model will enable Pinsents to be more competitive in our ability to review fixed prices."
Pinsents works with a number of major clients on a fixed-fee basis, including Balfour Beatty and E.ON. The firm was recently reappointed as Balfour's sole legal supplier for day-to-day legal work until 2020.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
What About the Old Partners Who Have No Interest in AI?
Avantia CEO Discusses Blurring Lines Between Law Firm, Software Provider and ALSP
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250