Score! New Tool Helps Law Schools Compare GRE to LSAT
The technology allows users to plug in the various scores earned on the GRE and find out the comparable score on the Law School Admission Test.
March 15, 2018 at 02:37 PM
5 minute read
Seventeen law schools now accept the GRE in addition to the Law School Admission Test, but making sense of an applicant's GRE scores can be tough for admissions officers accustomed to dealing only with the law school-specific test.
Now, the maker of the GRE has created an online comparison tool that predicts the LSAT score an applicant would earn based on their GRE results. It's the second such tool offered by Educational Testing Service (ETS), which already has a tool to convert GRE scores into scores on the GMAT—the standardized test traditional used by business schools.
“The comparison tool helps the growing number of law schools accepting GRE scores to understand and appropriately interpret those scores in the context of LSAT scores to better inform their admissions decisions,” said Educational Testing Service vice president David Payne.
The comparison tool, which also can be used by individuals who have taken the GRE to see how they'd perform on the LSAT, is the latest move by ETS to take on the LSAT and expand into law school admissions. The testing organization has conducted GRE validity studies at numerous individual law schools, and in October released a study using data from 21 law schools that concluded the GRE is just as good as the LSAT in predicting first -year law school grades. (Kellye Testy, president of LSAT maker the Law School Admission Council, has raised concerns with the methodology of those validity studies.)
Meanwhile, the American Bar Association's Council of the Section of Legal Education and Admission to the Bar has yet to decide whether or not it will allow all schools to freely use the GRE, or prohibit its use altogether.
Law schools that have embraced the GRE say they are seeking to enlarge their applicant pools, and make it easier for those with backgrounds in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) to apply. They also cite the accessibility of the GRE, which is offered throughout the year, as opposed to the LSAT's six annual administrations.
“We already know that GRE scores are a valid predictor of law school success for us, and we've seen other law schools perform similar evaluations and reach similar conclusions,” said Cary Cluck, assistant dean for admissions at the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law, which in 2016 became the first law school to accept GRE scores. “Based on those foundations, and the work of ETS in the national validity study they conducted, the new GRE comparison tool for law schools gives us even more insight when it comes to evaluating applicants.”
On a practical level, predicting an applicant's LSAT score based on their score earned on the GRE is more complicated than a simple one-to-one comparison. LSAT scores are reported as a singe number between 120 and 180. But GRE scores are reported as three separate numbers: a verbal reasoning score and a quantitative reasoning score both ranging from 130 to 170, as well as an analytical writing score between 0 and 6.
The LSAT comparison tool uses only the verbal reasoning and quantitative reasoning scores, with the verbal reasoning carrying a heavier weight in the calculation. (The tool does not use the GRE's analytical writing score because the LSAT's writing sample is not scored and does not impact a taker's overall score.) For instance, a high score on the verbal reasoning portion of the GRE—170—but a middling score on the quantitative reasoning section—145—yields a predicted LSAT score of 166, which is relatively high. But when those scores are reversed on the GRE sections, the predicted LSAT score drops to 159.
The comparison tool can't offer an exact prediction of how GRE takers would score on the LSAT, however. ETS said there is a five-point margin of error on the LSAT scoring scale. That range “simply reflects the fact that a test taker would not score exactly the same each time they take a test or on every version of the test,” according to an ETS fact sheet about the comparison tool. But five points can represent a big difference among a school's applicant pool. At Harvard Law School, which was the second to begin accepting the GRE after Arizona, there's a five-point difference between the school's 75th LSAT percentile of 175 and its 25th percentile at 170, according the most recent data reported to the ABA.
“The GRE test can help institutions achieve their admissions goals because it is taken by over a half a million test takers annually from a broad array of backgrounds—including science and technology fields—that are relevant to the changing needs of the law profession,” Payne said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
- 1Revisiting the Boundaries Between Proper and Improper Argument: 10 Years Later
- 2Hochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
- 3Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
- 4Biden commutes sentences for 37 of 40 federal death row inmates, including two convicted of California murders
- 5Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250