$33M SEC Whistleblower Award Sets Agency Record
"These awards demonstrate that whistleblowers can provide the SEC with incredibly significant information that enables us to pursue and remedy serious violations that might otherwise go unnoticed," Jane Norberg, chief of the SEC's whistleblower office, said in a statement Monday.
March 19, 2018 at 12:46 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Jane Norberg, the SEC's whistleblower chief. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi
Updated at 1:54 p.m.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday awarded a whistleblower more than $33 million—the largest bounty issued in the seven-year history of the agency's program for rewarding tipsters—for tipping off authorities about misconduct at Merrill Lynch.
In addition to the $33 million award, which broke the previous high of $30 million issued in 2014 to a whistleblower in a foreign country, the SEC announced that two other tipsters would share a nearly $50 million award.
The three whistleblowers, represented by Labaton Sucharow LLP partner Jordan Thomas in New York, helped an SEC investigation into Bank of America Corp.'s Merrill Lynch brokerage that resulted in a $415 million settlement in 2016 and an admission that the firm's brokerage unit misused consumers' cash. The settlement resolved claims that Merrill Lynch violated the agency's Customer Protection Rule by keeping at its disposal billions of dollars that should have been deposited into a reserve account meant to protect customers in the event of the firm's failure.
Jordan ThomasThomas, a former SEC attorney, said the three whistleblowers reported anonymously through him to the SEC. The agency's rules require whistleblowers reporting anonymously to retain counsel.
“The best protection against retaliation and blacklisting is the ability to report anonymously,” Thomas said in a brief phone interview Monday. “My clients have been fortunate to avoid such negative outcomes because of the SEC whistleblower program.”
“As a result,” he added, “my clients have been able to live a normal life and will be able to live a normal life—just with a lot more money.”
In a prepared statement, Thomas described his clients as “a shining example of integrity in action” and said they planned to donate “a substantial part of this life changing award” to charities. Thomas declined to detail the fees he earned representing the three whistleblowers.
The SEC's announcement did not specify which enforcement action the three whistleblowers aided. The agency has a policy against identifying whistleblowers.
With the three bounties approved Monday, the SEC has now awarded 53 whistleblowers since the program's start. The agency has approved more than $262 million in whistleblower bounties since issuing its first award, of $50,000, in 2012.
”These awards demonstrate that whistleblowers can provide the SEC with incredibly significant information that enables us to pursue and remedy serious violations that might otherwise go unnoticed,” said Jane Norberg, chief of the SEC's whistleblower office. ”We hope that these awards encourage others with specific, high-quality information regarding securities laws violations to step forward and report it to the SEC.”
The latest awards come at a challenging time for the SEC's whistleblower program, which was created as part of the Dodd-Frank financial reforms passed in 2010.
In February, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that whistleblowers must contact the SEC to benefit from Dodd-Frank's more robust protections against retaliation. The ruling dealt a blow to the SEC's broader interpretation of the statute. The agency and the U.S. Justice Department had taken the view that Dodd-Frank's whistleblower protections also extended to tipsters who only reported concerns internally to their employers.
Whistleblower lawyers have said the Supreme Court's ruling, in Digital Realty Trust v. Somers, could backfire against corporate America and drive employees who might otherwise report internally to contact the SEC with suspicions or evidence of misconduct.
For the SEC, the ruling raises the question of how vociferously the whistleblower office should continue to promote internal reporting as a first step for would-be tipsters. The SEC, which awards worthy whistleblowers with between 10 and 30 percent of money collected when sanctions from an enforcement action exceed $1 million, looks fondly on those who first raise concerns to their employers.
This report was updated with additional information about the SEC's awards.
The SEC's whistleblower order is posted below:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Delaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute readThe Week in Data Dec. 19: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Davis Polk Moves to New, Expanded Redwood City Office
Trending Stories
- 1Volunteers Unreimbursed Expenses — Tax Incentives For Itemizers
- 2Carter Mario Achieves $225,000 Settlement in Motor Vehicle Case
- 3Legal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
- 4'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
- 5SEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250