Facebook's Paul Grewal No Stranger to Data Privacy Fights
Paul Grewal, the Facebook in-house lawyer who has had the unenviable task of being the company's public voice addressing the Cambridge Analytica scandal, has a history of engaging with thorny privacy issues going back to his days on the federal bench in San Jose.
March 20, 2018 at 04:34 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Paul Grewal, Facebook's vice president and deputy general counsel, has had the unenviable task of being the public voice for the company as it has tried to explain how voter-profiling company Cambridge Analytica gained access to information for 50 million Facebook users without their permission.
The brewing privacy scandal has led to criticism from politicians on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean of the company and its handling of user information.
Grewal announced in a March 19 blog post that Facebook was suspending Cambridge Analytica and a Cambridge University psychology professor who had given the company access to data harvested from a Facebook app that about 270,000 users had granted permission to access their profiles.
“We are committed to vigorously enforcing our policies to protect people's information,” Grewal wrote in the blog post. “We will take whatever steps are required to see that this happens. We will take legal action if necessary to hold them responsible and accountable for any unlawful behavior.”
A Facebook spokesman declined to make Grewal available for comment Tuesday. Grewal, who joined the company in the summer of 2016 after half a dozen years on the federal bench as a magistrate judge in San Jose, California, has a history of engaging thorny privacy questions.
On the bench, Grewal developed a reputation for closely scrutinizing federal prosecutors' requests for information from technology companies as part of ongoing criminal investigations. In December 2014, for instance, Grewal refused to sign off on an indefinite gag order prohibiting Microsoft Corp. from disclosing a warrant for access to a Hotmail account holder's email. The ruling followed another from August of that year where Grewal declined a request for a warrant to search a suspect's Gmail account as overbroad, and questioned a prosecutor's request to indefinitely put off notifying a suspect that his vehicle's movements were being tracked.
“Does the court have the authority to grant such a 'prospective' order?” Grewal wrote at the time. “The court's own efforts to find guidance in the case law did not yield much.”
Since joining Facebook, Grewal has been asked by his former colleagues on the bench to discuss issues he's worked on at Facebook, including how the company is addressing the proliferation of so-called fake news on its platform.
“Teasing out the false viral story from the true or accurate viral story is no small challenge,” Grewal said last year while speaking as part of a panel at the Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference. “There is important economic and financial underpinning under this that are just as critical at getting to the bottom of as” the technological questions, Grewal said.
“Even without legislation there are strong incentives to get this right,” said Grewal at the time. “Consumer trust is paramount.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoogle Fails to Secure Long-Term Stay of Order Requiring It to Open App Store to Rivals
'Am I Spending Time in the Right Place?' SPX Technologies CLO Cherée Johnson on Living and Leading With Intent
9 minute read'Building Guardrails': Adobe's AGC on Legal's Responsibility in Generative AI
8 minute read'Take the Ego Out of It': Why a CLO Made Finding His Successor a Multiyear Process
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Glynn County Judge Rejects Ex-DA's Motion to Halt Her Misconduct Trial in Ahmaud Arbery Investigation
- 2Pa 100: Largest Law Firms
- 3Whistleblowers Are Here To Stay: Counseling Corporate Clients on Whistleblower Programs
- 4Intentionally Caused Motor Vehicle Accidents In the Video Spotlight
- 5Scrap the State's Taxpayer Funding of Elections
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250