Poll: Don't Put Too Much Stock in U.S. News Law School Rankings
The publication's annual list looms large in the law school application landscape, yet more than half of recent grads say applicants put too much stock in the list.
March 20, 2018 at 02:29 PM
3 minute read
To be happy in law school, J.D.-seekers should look beyond the U.S. News & World Report rankings when choosing where to enroll.
A new survey of recent law graduates found that a slim majority said applicants place too much importance on the U.S. News rankings when choosing a law school.
Just over half—51 percent—of the 2017 law graduates polled by Kaplan Bar Review last month said applicants give the rankings too much weight when making enrollment decisions. Another 37 percent of the 201 respondents said applicants place the right amount of value on the U.S. News rankings, while the remaining 12 percent said the rankings are valued too little by applicants.
“A school's ranking doesn't necessarily get you happiness or a good experience as a law school student or graduate,” said Tammi Rice, vice president of Kaplan Bar Review. “Our experience is that it's a statistic much more important to law school administrators, as it's understandably an important recruitment and fundraising tool.”
Indeed, law deans love to hate the annual U.S. News rankings. Among the most common criticism of the ranking is the emphasis it places on the median Law School Admission Test score of each school's incoming students. Critics say their rankings formula encourages schools to put money toward merit-based scholarships to lure high LSAT scorers at the expense of need-based scholarships. U.S. News' formula also rewards schools that spend more per student and have low student-faculty ratios, which discourages cost cutting and lower tuition. Legal educators have also charged that the rankings' reliance on reputational assessments by academic, lawyers and judges is at the root of so-called “law porn”—the glossy brochures and magazines extolling the virtues of a campus that clog up the mailboxes of those who may fill out U.S. News' surveys.
The U.S. News rankings play an outsized role in law school admissions partly because it's the only major ranking of law campuses. By contrast, business schools are ranked by numerous national publications.
“Our advice to aspiring lawyers has always been that while rankings can play a useful role in helping them decide where to apply, they should look closely at other statistics, including how many of a law school's graduates have found a job in the legal field and what the law school's bar passage rate is,” Rice said. “You cannot be a practicing attorney without passing the bar.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250