Getting a Better View: Data Visualization in Legal Analytics
With the right visual representations of data, legal analytics tools can help quickly identify issues with the data and recognize potential patterns.
March 22, 2018 at 09:49 AM
4 minute read
Collecting, mining and analyzing data in the best way possible may seem like the holy grail of analytics, but the ability to make decisions on data is only as good as the ease with which it can be read. That is where good data visualization techniques come in. With the right visual representations of data through charts and graphs, today's best legal analytics tools can help the analyst quickly identify issues with the data, assess outliers, and recognize potential patterns.
“You can spend all the time in the world mining data, developing and administering a database that collects all of your information and have the best model, but if you present it to your users in a way that makes it impossible to consume and understand, it will quickly become an unused asset,” says Scott Springer, senior director at HBR Consulting. Most simply, visualization makes it easier to “discover” information, meaning it helps users identify trends in historical data, query data to quickly answer questions that used to require database experts and pinpoint outliers that exist in data sets.
There is a reason why Apple is one of the most successful companies in the world, he points out — it thinks first and foremost about how consumers will interact with its products. “In the age of mobility and web-based applications, law firm users are not going to accept antiquated data visualization techniques or products that are not easy to use,” he says.
As legal technology has become more advanced, data visualization has evolved significantly, he adds. “Just five years ago, the tools we have today that support self-service analytics and visualizations did not exist,” he says. The visualization landscape, he explains, is changing completely with platforms that require very little training and significantly smaller learning curves to roll out on a broad scale.
“It has been exciting to see law firms move from static budget reporting techniques like PDFs and spreadsheets to visuals that provide stoplight-like details and drill-down capabilities,” he says. In addition, these tools have fueled increased collaboration at law firms and bring a level of transparency that provides immediate value through tighter compliance to budgets, especially in areas like business development.
However, data visualization is a two-way street. You cannot have good visualizations without clean data, Springer explains, and you cannot have clean data without visualizations. “Otherwise, you will always find yourself searching for the needle in the haystack,” he says. “Just think about how difficult it would be to use platforms like Twitter or Facebook if tweets and posts came through in plain text in a single line on a spreadsheet – not convenient, easy or fun to use.”
To take optimal advantage of data visualization options within legal analytics tools, a close partnership with IT is a must. More and more firms, says Springer, are employing a dedicated support staff, and even UI or UX-trained employees, to support their data platforms.
“The failures that I have seen can most often be equated to lack of a long-term vision for support of these products,” he says. Regardless of how self-service a visualization claims to be, there will always be a learning curve and a premium on helping to curate the right information to the right people, he adds: “Given how fast this space is changing, it often requires either dedicated support and training resources or partnering with a third-party that can help you stay on top of the latest trends.”
Sharon Goldman has been covering B2B technology topics for more than 10 years, including for publications such as CIO.com, Adweek, Digital Insurance, Shopper Marketing and DMNews.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCushman Benchmark Survey (the “Sweepstakes”) Official Terms and Conditions
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250