DLA gender pay report shows 54% bonus gap as Norton Rose releases partner compensation details
Firm's gender pay gap report shows male employees are paid 17.8% more than women
March 23, 2018 at 06:53 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
DLA Piper has revealed that its male staff are, on average, paid bonuses 53.6% higher than women in the firm's UK gender pay gap report, released yesterday (21 March).
However, when taking the median average, DLA is able to report a 0% bonus gap, a result the firm says is down to "a large population of business services employees receiving an equal, fixed end-of-year bonus amount".
The firm's mean bonus gap is larger than the average of about 30% reported by other UK top 50 firms to date, although the report also shows that more female staff (58.8%) received a bonus than men (53.3%).
Overall, the firm has a mean average pay gap of 17.8% in favour of men. This is higher than the 13.9% gap reported by Freshfields, but below magic circle firms Allen & Overy and Linklaters, which reported 19.8% and 23.2% respectively.
Women make up the majority of employees in all quartiles with the exception of the upper quartile, which is 51% male, with women making up 72% of the firm's lowest-paid quartile.
In a statement released with the report, DLA UK managing partner Sandra Wallace (pictured) said: "We were pleased to be able to show that men and women are equally distributed within the top salary quartile, indicating a relatively equal gender split in the highest paid roles, however there is more work to be done to ensure we strive for a good gender balance at all levels of our organisation."
Norton Rose Fulbright has also published its UK gender pay gap report, becoming one of a small but growing group of law firms to reveal details of partner compensation.
The firm's report reveals than on average, female partners receive 38% more in bonuses than men. However, men are still paid a mean average of 19% more than their female counterparts. The firm's analysis is based on UK partners only and includes all partners in management positions.
Among associates, the pay gap is 0.5% in favour of female associates, although male associates receive on average 5% more in bonuses than women.
Among all other employees – including business services staff, secretarial staff and trainees – men are paid on average 25.5% more than women, with average bonus pay 56% higher than female staff.
When employees and partners are combined, the firm's overall mean gender pay gap is 49% in favour of men, with men paid an average of 61.4% more in bonuses, a result the firm attributed to "the relatively low number of female partners at the senior end of the partnership".
Women also dominate the lowest-paid quartile of staff at the firm, with female employees making up 75% of the group, although within this quartile women are paid on average 15.3% more than their male equivalents.
Other UK top 50 firms to have released their gender pay gap reports include Macfarlanes – where hourly pay for male staff is on average 16.5% higher than for women – and Reed Smith, which went beyond reporting requirements by including details of partner earnings.
The US firm's report revealed that while male partners are paid on average just 0.83% more than female partners, female UK partners received on average 21.5% less in bonuses.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readPeople and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
7 minute readNewly Formed DEI Practices Expect Heightened Demand During Trump Administration
Transgender Woman Awarded $150K Default Judgment Against Corrections Officer for Alleged Assault
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250