How Law Firms Can Boost the Use of Data Analytics
The rise of data analytics in the legal world over the past decade has been inevitable as legal tasks have always involved intensive data gathering and analysis.
March 25, 2018 at 11:24 AM
5 minute read
The rise of data analytics in the legal world over the past decade has, perhaps, been inevitable. Legal tasks have always involved intensive data gathering and analysis of facts, while the world as a whole is becoming more digital at a rapid pace — allowing for advanced analysis of information that previously could only been done in books or on paper.
As a result, law firms are employing analytics in a variety of ways: Some are outward-facing, including developing facts to achieve client objectives in areas such as litigation, investigations, mergers and acquisitions. Other use cases are inward-facing, including using data to help law firms understand how they put together legal products and services.
The most forward-thinking and competitive law firms are developing an analytics strategy in a way that makes sense for their position in the market and where they want to go, says Bennett Borden, chief data scientist at Drinker Biddle & Reath. “Law firms that know how to use data analytics to achieve client objectives will simply be better than those who do not.”
These days, in order to succeed in a competitive landscape, all firms need should be boosting their use of data analytics, agrees Duc Chu, technology and innovation officer at Holland & Hart. “Firms that do not keep pace with the analytics of this data risk falling behind competitors,” he says.
A data analytics strategy is most commonly developed within the administrative functions of the firm, explains Borden. “However, until data analytics drives revenue generation it will never have the impact that it should within a law firm,” he cautions.
Not surprisingly, then, the first area ripe for expanding analytics efforts falls into financial data, Chu explains. “Time keeping, revenue, costs, and effectiveness are generally the first areas firms examine when moving to a data-driven model, since these directly impact a firm's bottom line,” he says, adding that this is often the easiest way to get buy-in to expand the use of data analytics.
Borden agrees, adding that those who are spearheading the effort to boost data analytics should first understand what data analytics can do and how law firms may need to change their processes or models to reflect the possibility of increased efficiency and accuracy through analytics. “You have to be nimble enough to change your revenue model so that you're capturing value.”
Getting out of the starting blocks for data analytics is already daunting for many firms, says Chu. “Most firms do not have the technical expertise to build analytic solutions internally, yet trusting an external vendor is worrisome given the cost and sensitivity of the data.”
When it comes to expanding the use of analytics successfully, however, there are other challenges law firms need to overcome. For instance, most law firms are dependent on Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) software and interconnecting the data from these disparate sources and vendors is one of the major obstacles to advancing complex analytics, says Chu.
According to Borden, the biggest obstacle is that those who understand data science usually don't understand the problems that need to be solved, and those who understand the problems don't understand what data science can do. “Somehow you've got to get people in the room who understand both the data science and the problems you're trying to overcome or the objectives you're trying to achieve.”
In addition, he believes most firms fall short by trying to do too much at once. “At our firm, we chose to focus on developing a data analytics strategy in specific areas that related directly to revenue generation,” he says. “This allowed us to have some quick wins and some clear metrics showing immediate success, which allowed us to get more buy-in for more complex projects.”
The good news? Data analytics tools are maturing and becoming more accessible to law firm users who are not data scientists, Borden says. “There are some really interesting tools coming into the legal space that firms can employ without developing a whole bench of data scientists,” he explains. “Some of these give you insight into market, industry, and regulatory trends, while others give you insight into lawyers, courts and judges, or give improvements into legal research.”
If you're looking to boost your use of data analytics, Borden recommends tasking a group to stay abreast of these trends. “Firms should task folks to keep an eye on tools that are constantly being developed,” he says. “They can determine whether they might help them create a better legal product or service or distinguish them in the market.”
Sharon Goldman has been covering B2B technology topics for more than 10 years, including for publications such as CIO.com, Adweek, Digital Insurance, Shopper Marketing and DMNews.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCushman Benchmark Survey (the “Sweepstakes”) Official Terms and Conditions
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250