How Law Firms Can Boost the Use of Data Analytics
The rise of data analytics in the legal world over the past decade has been inevitable as legal tasks have always involved intensive data gathering and analysis.
March 25, 2018 at 11:24 AM
5 minute read
The rise of data analytics in the legal world over the past decade has, perhaps, been inevitable. Legal tasks have always involved intensive data gathering and analysis of facts, while the world as a whole is becoming more digital at a rapid pace — allowing for advanced analysis of information that previously could only been done in books or on paper.
As a result, law firms are employing analytics in a variety of ways: Some are outward-facing, including developing facts to achieve client objectives in areas such as litigation, investigations, mergers and acquisitions. Other use cases are inward-facing, including using data to help law firms understand how they put together legal products and services.
The most forward-thinking and competitive law firms are developing an analytics strategy in a way that makes sense for their position in the market and where they want to go, says Bennett Borden, chief data scientist at Drinker Biddle & Reath. “Law firms that know how to use data analytics to achieve client objectives will simply be better than those who do not.”
These days, in order to succeed in a competitive landscape, all firms need should be boosting their use of data analytics, agrees Duc Chu, technology and innovation officer at Holland & Hart. “Firms that do not keep pace with the analytics of this data risk falling behind competitors,” he says.
A data analytics strategy is most commonly developed within the administrative functions of the firm, explains Borden. “However, until data analytics drives revenue generation it will never have the impact that it should within a law firm,” he cautions.
Not surprisingly, then, the first area ripe for expanding analytics efforts falls into financial data, Chu explains. “Time keeping, revenue, costs, and effectiveness are generally the first areas firms examine when moving to a data-driven model, since these directly impact a firm's bottom line,” he says, adding that this is often the easiest way to get buy-in to expand the use of data analytics.
Borden agrees, adding that those who are spearheading the effort to boost data analytics should first understand what data analytics can do and how law firms may need to change their processes or models to reflect the possibility of increased efficiency and accuracy through analytics. “You have to be nimble enough to change your revenue model so that you're capturing value.”
Getting out of the starting blocks for data analytics is already daunting for many firms, says Chu. “Most firms do not have the technical expertise to build analytic solutions internally, yet trusting an external vendor is worrisome given the cost and sensitivity of the data.”
When it comes to expanding the use of analytics successfully, however, there are other challenges law firms need to overcome. For instance, most law firms are dependent on Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) software and interconnecting the data from these disparate sources and vendors is one of the major obstacles to advancing complex analytics, says Chu.
According to Borden, the biggest obstacle is that those who understand data science usually don't understand the problems that need to be solved, and those who understand the problems don't understand what data science can do. “Somehow you've got to get people in the room who understand both the data science and the problems you're trying to overcome or the objectives you're trying to achieve.”
In addition, he believes most firms fall short by trying to do too much at once. “At our firm, we chose to focus on developing a data analytics strategy in specific areas that related directly to revenue generation,” he says. “This allowed us to have some quick wins and some clear metrics showing immediate success, which allowed us to get more buy-in for more complex projects.”
The good news? Data analytics tools are maturing and becoming more accessible to law firm users who are not data scientists, Borden says. “There are some really interesting tools coming into the legal space that firms can employ without developing a whole bench of data scientists,” he explains. “Some of these give you insight into market, industry, and regulatory trends, while others give you insight into lawyers, courts and judges, or give improvements into legal research.”
If you're looking to boost your use of data analytics, Borden recommends tasking a group to stay abreast of these trends. “Firms should task folks to keep an eye on tools that are constantly being developed,” he says. “They can determine whether they might help them create a better legal product or service or distinguish them in the market.”
Sharon Goldman has been covering B2B technology topics for more than 10 years, including for publications such as CIO.com, Adweek, Digital Insurance, Shopper Marketing and DMNews.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCushman Benchmark Survey (the “Sweepstakes”) Official Terms and Conditions
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250