Savannah Law School Closure Yields Student Class Action
"Earlier today, we filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of the students at Savannah Law School and are actively seeking justice on their behalf,” Stephen Lowry of Harris Lowry Manton said. “We hope to help these students secure an adequate recovery in light of this devastating turn of events."
March 26, 2018 at 02:27 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Report
Within days of Savannah Law School announcing its closing last Wednesday, students filed a putative class action for breach of contract and negligence, seeking relief including attorney fees and punitive damages.
“Earlier today, we filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of the students at Savannah Law School and are actively seeking justice on their behalf,” Stephen Lowry of Harris Lowry Manton said in a Friday evening news release. The plaintiffs firm has offices in Savannah and Atlanta.
The school's administrators told students Wednesday that they would be closing at the end of the spring 2018 semester. They said the school's building had been sold, and students would finish the semester at an undisclosed location, according to the lawsuit and local news reports.
Savannah Law School operates as a branch of Atlanta's John Marshall Law School. Administrators told students they would be offered a one-time $2,000 scholarship to transfer to Atlanta.
“These students attended Savannah Law School in good faith, with the expectation that they could complete a law degree in Savannah from an accredited institution,” Lowry said. “We hope to help these students secure an adequate recovery in light of this devastating turn of events.”
Savannah Law School Dean Malcolm Morris could not be reached immediately for comment on the class action, and didn't provide comment to The Daily Report when first asked about the closure. The school did release a statement last Thursday citing an “unforeseen national decline” in legal jobs and the law school applicant pool. “The Board's decision was prompted by the continued small student enrollment at the branch. As such, it was the Board's responsibility to acknowledge that a viable program of legal education could not be sustained at that location,” the school's statement said.
The complaint, filed in Chatham County State Court, named both Savannah Law School and John Marshall Law School as defendants. It accuses them of “false and misleading representations and omissions” about financial stability, the grading curve and noncompliance with American Bar Association accreditation standards, as well as denying students the opportunity to take a full course of legal studies and obtain a J.D. where they started.
John Marshall is one of 10 law schools nationwide that the ABA has sanctioned for violating admissions standards.
The students also alleged that their grades were devalued. “Following the announcement of the closure, students were notified that any who sought to transfer their credits to another school would receive a letter informing that school that the school used a deflated grading curve—that is, that its grades are curved to a 2.7 rather than a customary 2.9 or 3.0,” the complaint said.
The students also took issue with the sale of the law school's nearly 200-year-old building on Drayton Street, the former Candler Hospital. “At least one legal news site has reported 'speculat[ion] that Savannah Law was opened in the first place [by Atlanta's John Marshall] with the goal of using federal student loans as income to wait out the market before flipping on a prime piece of real estate,'” the complaint said.
Full-time students at the private, for-profit law school paid approximately $21,100 per semester, the complaint said. Part-time students paid $12,660 per semester.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSettlement Negotiations Taking Shape in Class Action Against Poppi Prebiotic Sodas
2 minute readKeller Postman and Jenner & Block Accuse Each Other of Unethical Actions in Tubi Settlement
7 minute readBig Tech and Internet Companies Slammed With Consumer Class Actions in December
'A Never-Ending Nightmare': Apple Sued for Alleged Failure to Protect Child Sexual Abuse Survivors
Trending Stories
- 1‘Badge of Honor’: SEC Targets CyberKongz in Token Registration Dispute
- 25 Longtime Broward County Judges Set to Retire by End of 2024
- 3Top Five Florida Settlements of 2024
- 4Black, Hispanic Law Student Enrollment Falls at Top 14 Following End of Affirmative Action, but Mostly Improved at California's Top Schools
- 5Justices Wade Into South Carolina's Medicaid Fight With Planned Parenthood
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250