Bringing New Ideas and Approaches to the Table
Tired of fruitless "brainstorming" sessions? Try this approach to creative problem solving at your next team meeting.
April 05, 2018 at 04:18 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
We know you often need to generate new approaches to handling client issues, challenges with the case or deal, finding creative arguments to research and formulate, and so much more. In fact, it is a good sign if you are looking for new approaches—your clients will appreciate that. But how do you begin? You may think that pulling the team together and brainstorming might be a good solution. Well, we are here to tell you not to take this path. Try another—it is a more effective way to generate new ideas and we will take you through that in this tool.
Checklist:
- Articulate the problem to be solved for which you need new creative ideas.
- Tell the team that you will be driving toward actionable ideas and using a form of idea-generation that will be new to them.
- Determine whether you want to start with one idea and one small group or set up two or three groups. Each group can work on more than one idea, but only one at a time for each group.
- Choose a facilitator for each group, plus three members per idea discussion.
- Make sure participants know the challenge and prepare with research or reading prior to the session.
- Make sure the facilitator is prepared to help the team 'land the idea'.
- Make sure the facilitator chosen is someone who can stimulate creativity by asking questions.
- Make sure the team works on one idea at a time.
- Have the facilitator lead through a visual — whether a flipchart or a whiteboard.
- Have each member build on the idea via the visual.
- Collect all the ideas and review them with the team.
- Bring the best ideas to the client.
Lean Routine:
- Have you determined the problem that you need to solve? Are you able to articulate it clearly so that everyone on the team can look at the problem statement and understand it? Is the problem you think needs to be solved the right problem?
- Once you have established that you need new ideas to address a stated problem, consider the approach you will take to identifying those ideas.
-
- We advocate a form of new idea-generation called "greenhousing." It is anti–brainstorming, which is known to kill creativity. We learned 'greenhousing' from a company called ?What If!, which provides innovation training to companies seeking to innovate to build new revenue-generating products.
- ?What If! tells us that standard brainstorming does not work because:
- Brainstorming focuses on quantity and not quality.
- Brainstorming can result in the loudest voices getting their ideas on the list even if those are not the best ideas.
- Team members tend not to prepare for brainstorming so it is less informed.
- Team members tend not to build on ideas (especially the best ideas).
- And perhaps most important of all, the ideas are often not actionable. Read here for more on why brainstorming doesn't work.
- To execute on 'greenhousing,' you need to first select a facilitator and three people to generate the actionable ideas. It is important that the group be small in order to pull off what ?What If! calls 'productive creativity.'
-
- The three members should represent different areas of expertise—perhaps different practice areas or different levels of experience, or both.
- The role of the facilitator is to help 'land an idea.'
- Work on one idea at a time and build on it. The facilitator might draw or write on the board and then invite each of the three participants to add to the idea, whether it is a visual, like a timeline or a scene recreation, or an argument with various components, like a decision tree.
- If required, you can set up two or three different groups with different idea starters so that in the end you have a few actionable ideas. But, each one should be run the same—small, focused on one idea that is built upon, that people come prepared to address, and that the facilitator keeps everyone focused on.
- By the end, whether the facilitator takes a photo or you are there to capture, you should have very detailed ideas to review and potentially talk through with the rest of the team and even the client.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Narrow Path Back From Disbarment: 'You Have to Really Want to Be a Lawyer Again'
5 minute readNew Jersey Law Journal Names Mike Zogby Office Managing Partner of the Year
2 minute readClimate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
Trending Stories
- 1'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
- 2Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
- 3These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
- 4'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
- 5Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250