Facing Reality Checklist
This checklist helps you identify the brutal facts in any project.
April 05, 2018 at 03:55 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
What should you consider when identifying the brutal facts and important realities which you will have to manage during this project? This exercise is your durability test, to ensure that you are building your project with enduring realities, controllable future actions, and sound legal principles.
Checklist:
|- As always, gather in your planning work. It should be readily accessible and easily navigable.
- Identify the important issues, i.e. those on which success might depend, and separate them into a) facts, b) future events, and c) precedent
- Start with facts and verify that you can prove the important ones.
- Determine whether you will be able to control the important future events.
- Consider the provable facts and expected events together as a picture of your project in the future.
- Research and condense the key legal principles.
- Consider how these laws would apply to your picture of the project in the future.
- Verify that this exercise, as a whole, has been completed thoroughly.
- Identify any concerns, possible mitigation, and then consider the overall impact.
- Report to the client.
Lean Routine:
|- Have you gathered in and reviewed all of the key findings from the initial investigation?
- Have you thought about all of the possible issues on which success might depend? Have you isolated the important ones? Have you then divided those important issues into:
a. Facts and events that are in the past
b. Future events that can affect success
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman
2 minute readLegal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo
1 minute readHaynes Boone, Hicks Thomas Get Dismissal of $1.3B Claims in 2022 Freeport LNG Terminal Explosion
3 minute readMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Trending Stories
- 1Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 2'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo
- 5Battle for Top Talent Accelerates Amid Profit and Demand Surge
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250