How to Ask About Compensation in a Job Interview Without Sounding Greedy
For some, “comp” is deliberately discussed at the very beginning to qualify a candidate's viability upfront. For others, it's a topic that remains unaddressed until it's time to talk turkey. But waiting to discuss money until the interview process is at completion is not a wise move.
April 13, 2018 at 11:55 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Q: I'm near the end of a job interview process and still don't know the compensation range for the position. When and how should I ask without sounding greedy?
A: No two search processes are alike. And when it comes to disclosing … or discussing a position's compensation range, the timing of this talk-thread can be quite different in each process. For some, “comp” is deliberately discussed at the very beginning to qualify a candidate's viability upfront. For others, it's a topic that remains unaddressed until it's time to talk turkey. But waiting to discuss money until the interview process is at completion is not a wise move.
This might be easier said than done … as many candidates are uncomfortable raising the topic of compensation in the interview process. Why? Because they don't want to be perceived as solely caring about money, being greedy or having their priorities out of whack. So, they stay silent out of fear and wait for the employer to start the money dialogue. But inquiring about compensation does not have to be such an unsavory task. It can be empowering and demonstrate confidence depending on how … and when you ask. And as a candidate, it's important to be cognizant of compensation as you engage in an interview process—and gather this information before either party has invested too much time. As you assess the interview dynamics, use your best judgment regarding the appropriate time to raise the issue if an employer does not raise it.
In your situation, you are in the “final stages” of your interview process. And you and the employer have invested time and effort to get to this point. But despite your proximity to the finish line, you are still unaware of the compensation range for the position. And depending on the numbers, you could be pulled back to the Starting Line. So at this late stage, this lack of material information is not ideal—because if there is compensation misalignment, the time by both parties will not have been well spent. So my recommendation at this juncture is to address the compensation topic in your next conversation with HR or the hiring manager.
So what's the most effective way to raise the subject without the risk you'll be perceived negatively? Below are a few recommendations:
Message #1:
Employer: “So, do you have any questions at this point?”
Candidate Response #1: “Yes—It's been such a great process and I've been so engaged in getting to know everyone that I realized we never discussed the compensation range for the position. If you have any information available, that would be terrific.”
Candidate Response #2: “The role sounds very appealing and I'm very interested in the opportunity. Do you have a sense as to the compensation range for the position?”
Message #2
“Hi Robert, I really enjoyed my meetings on Monday with the executives and wanted to reach out to see if you could provide me with the compensation range for the position. We haven't had the opportunity to discuss it in the process so it would be great to know what the target range is for the role.
Message #3
“Thank you for taking so much time to meet with me Susan. The opportunity seems like it would be a great fit for both of us. Would you happen to know the compensation range for the position? I've been so focused on learning about the position and getting to know everyone that I haven't had that conversation with anyone in the organization. Any information you might be able to provide would be terrific.”
Raising the topic of compensation is rarely easy for a candidate, but it is important information to have when interviewing for a job that interests you. It's best to gather this information sooner rather than later, but if you find yourself near the end of an interview process without the numbers, I recommend you kick the comp inquiry into high gear. And inquire strategically in order to maximize your chances of a positive … and successful outcome.
Julie Brush is the founder and author of The Lawyer Whisperer (www.thelawyerwhisperer.com), a career advice column for legal professionals, also found on LinkedIn. She is co-founder of Solutus Legal Search, a legal search/consulting boutique firm, serving as a strategic adviser to lawyers, law firms and corporations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat Can I Do to Be Happier in My First Year as a Law Firm Associate?
Trending Stories
- 1Courts Demonstrate Growing Willingness to Sanction Courtroom Misuse of AI
- 2The New Rules of AI: Part 1—Managing Risk
- 3Change Is Coming to the EEOC—But Not Overnight
- 4Med Mal Defense Win Stands as State Appeals Court Rejects Arguments Over Blocked Cross-Examination
- 5Rejecting 'Blind Adherence to Outdated Precedent,’ US Judge Goes His Own Way on Attorney Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250