February Bar Exam Performance Hits Record Low
A decline in the average MBE score from the February 2018 bar exam does not bode well for pass rates, which are beginning to trickle out.
April 19, 2018 at 12:47 PM
4 minute read
Call it a tale of two bar exams.
Performance of law graduates taking the attorney licensing test in February has hit the lowest point in more than a decade, while scores for those taking the exam during the more popular July session have been on the upswing.
According to the National Conference of Bar Examiners, the average score on February's Multistate Bar Exam—the 200 multiple-choice question portion of the test used by all jurisdictions—fell 1.3 points from the previous year, to 132.8. That's the lowest average in more than 10 years, and marks the fourth straight year that the February average declined.
By contrast, the average MBE score from the July exam ticked up slightly in 2016 and went up 1.4 points in 2017.
The diverging performance of July and February bar takers largely boils down to repeat test takers, according to Judith Gundersen, president of the national conference. Fully 70 percent of those who sat for the bar in February had already taken the test at least once, and repeat takers on average perform worse than those in their first sitting.
Indeed, the average MBE score for first-time takers in February was 135, compared to 132 for repeat test takers, the national conference reported.
While the percentage of repeat takers did not change from the February 2017 exam, they didn't score as highly as the repeaters a year earlier, Gundersen said. Their average score fell 1.7 points from 2017. First-time February takers scored about the same as last year, she added.
“That percentage [of repeaters] from last year did not rise, but some of those repeaters' performance dropped from last year, affecting the mean,” she said.
➤➤ Want more reporting on trends in legal education? Sign up here for Ahead of the Curve by Karen Sloan, a new email briefing from Law.com. Each week, Karen examines the transformation of legal education, spotlights innovative programs and breaks down the latest law school news.
It's difficult to draw too many conclusions from the February bar exam scores because the cohort of those tested is relatively small, according to Pepperdine University School of Law professor Derek Muller, who tracks bar exam trends. Just 21,111 took the bar this February, compared with 46,627 in July 2017.
But law schools may have played a role in the February declines by positioning some lower-performing students to take that exam, instead of the July one, he said.
“I think some schools have been advising their more at-risk students to skip the July bar and study more for the February bar so they have a higher chance of passing the first time; if—big if!—that's the case, we would expect lower scores in this cohort,” Muller said.
It's likely that pass rates will be down for the most recent exam based on the lower MBE average, Gundersen said, though jurisdictions are still in the process of grading exams and releasing scores. (Jurisdictions set their own cut scores, so the MBE average doesn't offer a full picture of national results. Several jurisdictions, including Nevada and Oregon, have recently adopted lower cut scores, which should help boost their pass rates.)
February bar exam results are beginning to trickle in, however. Florida's February pass rate held steady at 58 percent. North Carolina's pass rate was 33 percent. In Mississippi, 36 percent of February bar takers passed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanctioned Penn Law Professor Amy Wax Sues University, Alleging Discrimination
5 minute readPenn State Dickinson Law Dean Named President-Elect of Association of American Law Schools
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250