Privacy Rights, Law Accessibility Win Big at Global Legal Hackathon Finale
The winning teams at the hackathon event focused on promoting user privacy and making the law more understandable to the everyday consumer.
April 23, 2018 at 02:00 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
The third and final round of the first ever Global Legal Hackathon—a legal tech development competition that boasted participants from across five continents and over 40 cities—concluded in New York on April 21. From among the 14 finalists, who had to present live prototypes of their solution to the events' judges, four winning teams were selected, two of which developed solutions to serve the private sector, and two for the public sector.
Winners from the private sector category included Budapest, Hungary-based Revealu, an app through which users can request their personal data from tech providers, and Denver-based LexLucid, an online website where attorneys review and grade online consumers contracts, such as terms of services, to help consumers understand their agreements.
From the public sector category, Hong Kong-based Decoding Law, a machine-learning powered browser extension to help users wade through local legislation and RightsNow, a legal knowledge repository accessible through voice services like Apple's Siri, Amazon's Alexa or Google Home, also came out on top.
The private sector solutions focused on helping to protect and promote consumer privacy during a time when many are concerned about their online rights and personal data. Marton Elodi, a developer and part of the team that created Revealu, noted that the app “acts like a middleman between companies and users to help users exercise their rights” under the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation. The regulation, which comes into effect on May 25, mandates that companies turn over all data they have on EU users upon request.
Elodi added that the app works both for companies and their users alike. It is an “off the shelf product that companies can use to provide the data to consumers” as well as a data portal for consumers themselves, he said.
LexLucid also took a broad approach to privacy with their app, which seeks to enable “consumers to make educated decisions online and encourage businesses to make their contracts fair,” said Otto Hanson, attorney at Davis Graham & Stubbs and founder of LexLucid.
Though the solution relies on the manual review of contracts by registered attorneys, in the long term, the goal is to automate more of the process. Hanson noted the “hope is that artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms will be able to do a lot of the contract grading for us, but that is very complex work for AI algorithms and we are just not there yet,” he added.
At the other end of the spectrum, the public sector solutions focused on making the law more transparent and understandable to everyday consumers.
The Decoding Law team, for example looked to help Hong Kong locals find and understand their city's legislation. The proposed solution, which the Hong Kong Department of Justice expressed interests in, “is essentially a chrome plug-in where you enter in your situation and questions and we will find you the exact provision under the legislation” to help, said Alison (Pui Wun) Li, a student at the University of Hong Kong, and part of the team that developed Decoding Law.
The solution functions as an AI-powered chatbot that helps find relevant legal provisions. It also allows users to highlight relevant provisions in legislation text, and has a sentence structure analysis feature that helps translate the complex legalese of highlighted provisions into easy to understand language.
RightsNow is also working on making legal information easier to find and comprehend. The app “saves time by not having to shift through all the information that Google will provide,” Matthew “Zeke” Hughes, senior director of business development at Mindcrest Inc., and co-founder of the app, previously told Legaltech News.
Maximilian Paterson, senior director of education and community programs at Neota Logic and the other co-founder of RightsNow also told Legaltech News that the aim of the app was to have a more seamless channel through which to access legal knowledge. Through voice services, “you can actually give law information on a very human level and it's accessible. So it's not only access to justice, but accessibility to justice as well.”
After the end of the Global Legal Hackathon, the winning teams were optimistic about the future, and wanted to hit the ground running on further developing their application.
“I think this is a really huge encouragement for us to seriously consider out next step, to go back home to discuss with our potential partners and seriously think about and submitting applications for funding to make this idea realized,” Decoding Law's Li said.
Likewise, LexLucid planned to figure out how best to expand their prototype. “We're going to launch a crowdfunding campaign probably over the next three or four months and use that crowdfunding campaign to test the market to see if this is something that consumers want,” Hanson said.
➤➤ Want to read more about how new tech is changing the legal profession? Sign up for What's Next, a weekly email briefing on the future of law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
'Everything Leaves a Digital Footprint': How to Navigate the Complexities of Internal Investigations
5 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
Old Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250