Lucasfilm Wins Early Battle With App Maker Over 'Sabacc' Trademark
In the "Star Wars" universe, Han Solo won the iconic Millennium Falcon spaceship by beating Lando Calrissian in a game of Sabacc. In court, Lucasfilm beat back a motion to dismiss its trademark lawsuit against Ren Ventures.
April 25, 2018 at 03:19 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Alden Ehrenreich as Han Solo in the upcoming movie “Solo: A Star Wars Story.” (Courtesy Lucasfilm Ltd.)
In a lawsuit over rights to a card game with a pivotal role in the “Star Wars” saga, Lucasfilm Ltd. won an early battle against app maker Ren Ventures Ltd. Tuesday.
A federal judge in San Francisco declined to dismiss Lucasfilm's claims based on Ren Ventures' use of various trademarks, primarily centered on the game “Sabacc.”
In the “Star Wars” universe, Han Solo won the iconic Millennium Falcon spaceship by beating Lando Calrissian in a game of Sabacc, a fact first noted in a draft of the screenplay for “Star Wars V: The Empire Strikes Back” and then the novelization of the 1980 film. A trilogy of novels about Calrissian published in 1983 included an explanation of the blackjack-line game where players seek a hand as close as possible to positive or negative 23 without going over.
Lucasfilm sued Ren Ventures last year claiming the company's “Sabacc” app violated the film company's intellectual property rights. The Sabacc app page in the Apple App Store, Lucasfilm's lawyers at New York's Shapiro Arato pointed out, makes numerous “Star Wars” allusions, including “From a Cantina far, far away to your mobile device, welcome to the world's largest Sabacc site” and “Go bust? Don't worry, we won't take your ship!”
But the app maker's lawyers at Hunton & Williams earlier this year asked U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California, who is overseeing the case, to dismiss Lucasfilm's federal and common-law trademark infringement and unfair competition claims. Trademarks, the Hunton lawyers claimed in their motion to dismiss, “distinguish the source of goods and services in commerce.”
“As a matter of logic, it is impossible to offer fictional goods and services in commerce because they do not exist,” they wrote.
The app maker's lawyers also pointed out the parties are fighting a parallel battle over a Sabacc trademark Ren Ventures registered in 2015 in a forum far, far away: the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
But in Tuesday's order, Seeborg found Lucasfilm had sufficiently shown its use of Sabacc marks predated the app maker's. The judge also found that in the “Star Wars” context, Sabacc doesn't simply function as a mark for a fictional game. Lucasfilm, the judge pointed out, profits from all sorts of merchandise based on its broad and fanciful “Star Wars” universe.
“The crux of Lucasfilm's claims is that defendants use the 'Sabacc' mark with the intention that consumers associate their unlicensed product with the 'Star Wars' franchise and its licensed products,” Seeborg wrote.
Shannon Broome, a lawyer for Ren Ventures at Hunton, didn't immediately respond to a message Wednesday. But this week, the app maker struck back at Lucasfilm, filing a lawsuit of its own against the film studio and the Denny's restaurant chain. The suit, filed in the Northern District of California, claims that a Sabacc-related promotion partnership between Lucasfilm and Denny's for the upcoming Han Solo movie violates Ren Ventures' registered trademark.
Lucasfilm's lawyers, Fabien Thayamballi and Cynthia Arato of Shapiro Arato, didn't immediately respond to email messages seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Delaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute readThe Week in Data Dec. 19: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Davis Polk Moves to New, Expanded Redwood City Office
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250