Higher Law: What to Ask Would-Be Clients? | California Pot Practices Flourish
Three cannabis lawyers tell us some foundational questions they ask before engaging new clients in this space. Plus: scroll down for highlights on first-quarter marijuana lobbying records.
April 27, 2018 at 01:08 PM
7 minute read
Welcome to Higher Law, our new weekly briefing about all things cannabis. I'm Cheryl Miller, reporting for Law.com from Sacramento. Check out what cannabis lawyers tell me about vetting prospective clients who are coming out of the shadows and into the regulated market. Scroll down for more on how marijuana practices are expanding in California. Plus: First-quarter federal lobbying disclosures reveal some of the new marijuana advocacy happening in Washington. Thanks for reading—and I love your feedback. Drop me a line at [email protected] or call me at 916-448-2935. I'm also tweeting @CapitalAccounts.
Want to receive Higher Law as a weekly email? Sign up here.
|
Asking the Right Questions: What Do You Say?
Everyone wants a piece of the Green Rush. But what's a lawyer to do with a potential client who's accustomed to working in marijuana's shadows, where agreements and ownership rights perhaps were not always cemented in formal documents?
I reached out recently to three lawyers in the cannabis space who told us how they approach those initial conservations with would-be clients. Those responses are below. I'm also interested in what you're hearing and seeing—so shoot me a note at [email protected].
➤➤ Katy Young, partner, Ad Astra Law Group, San Francisco
I only handle disputes, and filing lawsuits to resolve cannabis business disputes is still a fairly new phenomenon that the judiciary is not yet entirely used to, especially if your dispute would be filed in a conservative judicial district.
So I ask “What is your appetite for filing a lawsuit, and if you want to go that route, how comfortable are you with being a guinea pig for this kind of matter?”
I handle mostly partnership disputes and breach of contract actions. I see the same kind of opponent in nearly every conflict, so I ask “Would you describe the opponent as someone who considers him/herself to be the smartest person in any room?”
And the most common, a real classic in this industry, “Is any of what you are saying written down anywhere?” Otherwise it is just he said/she said.
➤➤ Dean Richardson, partner and trial section vice-chair, Moye White, in Denver
The first question in every representation is “How can we help you?”
Do you have an operating agreement, and what is the management structure of the company (it is manager-managed or member-managed)?
Who are the owners of the company and are there any disputes among owners?
Is there an arbitration agreement?
➤➤ Jason Klein, partner, Offit Kurman, Washington, D.C.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInside Track: Lawyers for Big Tech Give Harris Benefit of Doubt, Despite Pummeling They Took Under Biden
6th Circuit Judge Thapar on Making Originalism Work in Trial Courts
The Law Firm Disrupted: Quality Partner Training—The Exception or the Rule?
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250