Backlash Mounts Against Attorney Whose Racist Rant Went Viral
A lawyer caught on video making racially-charged comments to employees at a Midtown Manhattan eatery has been heavily criticized since the video went viral. But will he also face attorney disciplinary action?
May 17, 2018 at 03:43 PM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Video screenshot of attorney Aaron Schlossberg complaining about staff inside a lunch spot in Manhattan. |
A New York attorney caught hurling a racist rant in a video posted Wednesday may now be facing disciplinary troubles, as a backlash has produced calls for his disbarment, prompted a U.S. Congressman to file a formal grievance and caused members of the public to write scathing reviews of his legal practice on social media.
According to news reports, Manhattan-based lawyer Aaron Schlossberg—whose law firm website touts his language fluency in Spanish—is the man seen in a video that quickly went viral. In the video, a white man who appears to be Schlossberg can be heard berating the manager at Fresh Kitchen after overhearing a conversation in Spanish between other employees. The man accuses them of all being “undocumented” and threatens to call U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “I pay for their welfare, I pay for their ability to be here. The least they can do is speak English,” he said.
Now, Schlossberg is facing mounting backlash.
The lawyer did not respond to messages seeking comment, nor did anyone else from his office, and ALM could not independently confirm that the man in the video is, in fact, Schlossberg. But multiple news outlets, including the New York Daily News, the Jewish publication The Forward and The Intercept's civil rights-focused columnist Shaun King, did identify him as the attorney Schlossberg.
After the video went viral on Wednesday, U.S. Rep. Adriano Espaillat, D-New York, announced on Twitter that his office would file a formal complaint against Schlossberg with an attorney grievance committee in New York. An online petition also began circulating, calling for a disciplinary review of Schlossberg and his disbarment. At the time of publication, the petition had secured support from more than 8,000 people.
Espaillat carried through on his vow Thursday, filing a complaint and sending a joint letter with Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz Jr., according to a statement from the congressman's office.
“What was witnessed in the vile video from Mr. Schlossberg, which has since gone viral, is [a] humiliating and insulting attack on the more than 50 years of progress that this nation has made since the Civil Rights movement,” the politicians wrote to the grievance committee. “There is simply no place for the scourge of racism and the vulgarity of bigotry in our great nation.”
A call to the attorney grievance committee for New York's First Judicial Department, which would oversee a disciplinary case against Schlossberg since his office is in Manhattan, wasn't immediately returned.
Whether Schlossberg will actually face discipline, however, is unclear, according to Stephen Gillers, a legal ethics expert and professor at New York University School of Law. While it is true that lawyers can be disciplined for actions they take outside of court, Gillers said he could not recall any similar incidents that led to discipline. He also said that in most cases, the type of discipline that could apply here would most likely remain private.
“I've not heard of discipline for racist rants outside law practice and unaccompanied by violence,” Gillers said. “But most discipline is private so the public would not know.”
Such discipline could have taken place in private, he said.
“Whether the lawyer is disciplined will depend on whether he has prior discipline and his defense ('the meds made me do it,' for example). If the conduct leads to a conviction, even a minor one, discipline will be much more likely.”
Schlossberg does not have any history of public discipline, according to his attorney registration in New York. He was admitted to practice law in New York in 2003 after he graduated from George Washington University's law school.
Gillers also noted that the lawyer in this incident engaged in something that's arguably protected free speech. But, he said, it's not clear whether the First Amendment would shield a lawyer in Schlossberg's situation.
For example, former Brooklyn District Attorney Elizabeth Holtzman received a public reprimand in 1991 after making what the New York Court of Appeals deemed to be a false accusation about a judge. In that case, Holtzman—who went on to become a U.S. Congresswoman and is now counsel at Herrick Feinstein—was cited under a New York rule of professional conduct that prohibits behavior that “adversely reflects” on a lawyer's fitness.
“Lawyers are disciplined for things they say,” said Gillers. “But the lawyer here may have a stronger First Amendment claim [compared to Holtzman] because he was not attacking the integrity of the court system.”
Regardless of whether he faces potential disciplinary fallout, Schlossberg is taking a beating in the court of public opinion. As noted by The American Lawyer's affiliate publication Litigation Daily, Schlossberg's ratings on websites such as Yelp have taken a significant hit in the wake of the viral video.
“His firm had more than 1,100 Yelp reviews by Wednesday evening, virtually all one star, including a few that reviewed him as a Mexican restaurant,” the Litigation Daily wrote in a Thursday morning newsletter. “Another post includes his New York Bar registration number and the disciplinary committee's contact information. Yelp users also added images to his profile including a pig, a pile of garbage and a bottle of douche.”
The Intercept's King—who helped the video of the Fresh Kitchen tirade go viral by posting it to his Twitter page and seeking insights from his followers on the man's identity—has been unsparing in criticizing Schlossberg on Twitter. On Thursday, King posted another video from 2016 that, he said, appears to depict the same man accosting and berating a pedestrian on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan.
The pedestrian, a white man from Massachusetts named Willie Morris, posted a video blog about the encounter in October 2016, explaining that he was confronted unexpectedly while walking on the sidewalk on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan and then was verbally berated by a man who appears to be Schlossberg. Morris said it appeared that the man thought he was not an American. “What country you from? I'm going to call the police,” the man says to Morris in the video. “I'm a citizen here, you're not. You're an ugly fucking foreigner, so fuck you.”
In addition to Espaillat and the Bronx borough president, King's posts about the racist tirade elicited a response from one other elected official in New York. Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams also took to Twitter on Thursday to criticize Schlossberg.
“@ShaunKing is right. #AaronSchlossberg IS a bigot and a racist,” tweeted Adams. “He's also a major tool judging by his erratic, nonsensical behavior. This kind of blatant bigotry in the heart of the most diverse city in America is shameful. We must all speak out against hate wherever & whenever!”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Rejects Morgan Stanley Reconsideration Bid in Deferred Compensation Litigation
Transgender Woman Awarded $150K Default Judgment Against Corrections Officer for Alleged Assault
Legal Speak: A Convicted Felon is Coming to the White House. What Happens Now?
1 minute readAT&T General Counsel Joins ADM Board as Company Reels From Accounting Scandal
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250