Federal Judge Dismisses Suit Claiming Poland Spring's Water Isn't From Spring; State Suits Coming
Poland Spring got a victory of sorts from a Connecticut federal judge who dismissed a class action claiming breach of contract for saying the water comes from a spring. Suits are pending in state court.
May 21, 2018 at 03:12 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Connecticut Law Tribune
In the wake of a federal judge in Connecticut dismissing a putative class action lawsuit alleging Poland Spring's water did not come from a natural spring, plaintiffs' attorneys are vowing the legal fight will continue.
In his Thursday ruling, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Meyer said he was dismissing the fraud case against Nestle Waters North America Inc., Poland Spring's parent company, because the claim was pre-empted by federal law.
Meyer said the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has enacted detailed rules and regulations defining spring water under the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act. The act provides that only the federal government—not private parties—can enforce the violations.
But Meyer said the plaintiff attorneys, who are representing eight northeastern states, including Connecticut, New York and Massachusetts, can sue under state law within 30 days. That is exactly what the attorneys say they plan to do.
Alexander Schmidt, a New Jersey-based solo practitioner, issued a statement on the position of the eight attorneys representing the class. Schmidt said there would be no additional comments on the matter. The statement reads, in part: “The court rejected all of Nestle's arguments … holding that the plaintiff's should assert claims based on state law rules governing spring water. We intend to amend our complaint consistent with the ruling. The decision does not address the accuracy of our detailed factual allegations, which we look forward to providing.”
The lawsuit, among other things, claims that “not one drop” of Poland Spring bottled water is from a spring. The suit sought at least $5 million in damages for false advertising, deceptive labeling and breach of contract.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration says spring water must come from an underground source and flow naturally to the earth's surface. Spring water, according to the government, doesn't have to be literally collected from a spring. It can also be pumped out from a hole in the ground.
On the other hand, groundwater, the government says, is water found underground in the cracks and spaces in soil, sand and rock. It is stored in and moved slowly through geologic formations of soil, sand and rocks called aquifers.
Each of the states cited in the lawsuit have language that varies slightly. And that language in many cases mirrors what the federal government says.
According to the Connecticut State Department of Public Health, spring water means “natural water obtained from an underground formation from which water flows naturally to the surface of the earth.” That is the only wording regarding spring water on the state's site. With regard to bottled water, the state says: “A bottler selling or distributing bottled water obtained from a source located out of state shall submit to the Commissioner of Consumer Protection a copy of a current license or approval for the use of such source from each government entity having jurisdiction to regulate the use of the source.”
Charles Broll, general counsel for Nestle, told the Connecticut Law Tribune Monday he had no comment on the pending amended suit. He referred all other comment to the company's statement. That statement reiterated the ruling by the judge. In addition, the statement comes with a recently released report in which the legal megafirm DLA Piper Global Law Firm wrote an extensive report stating the company's bottled water was, in fact, spring water. The company hired DLA Piper to conduct an investigation and write the report.
“While I can't comment specifically on a potential refiling without seeing it, I can say that the claims made in this lawsuit are without merit,” Broll said. “We will continue to defend ourselves vigorously and are highly confident in our legal position. The judge's decision to grant our motion to dismiss is proof of that.”
Poland Spring is represented by Jeffrey M. Garrod of Orloff Lowenbach Stifelman & Siegel and Jonathan B. Tropp of Day Pitney.
In addition to Schmidt, the other attorneys representing the class are: Craig Raabe and Robert Izard of Izard, Kindall & Raabe in West Hartford; Steven Williams and Alexander Barnett of Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy in New York City and California; and Steven Sklaver, Amanda Bonn and Oleg Elkhunovich of Susman Godfrey in Los Angeles.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSolana Labs Co-Founder Allegedly Pocketed Ex-Wife’s ‘Millions of Dollars’ of Crypto Gains
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Insurer Not Required to Cover $29M Wrongful Death Judgment, Appeals Court Rules
- 2Slideshow: Jewish Bar Association of Georgia Marks 1st Year With Hanukkah Party
- 3Holland & Knight Launches Export Control Disputes and Advocacy Team
- 4Blake Lively's claims that movie co-star launched smear campaign gets support in publicist's suit
- 5Middle District of Pennsylvania's U.S. Attorney Announces Resignation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250