Critical Mass: How SCOTUS Roiled Class Action Bar. Plus, Why 'Bristol Myers' Defense Failed in Pa. Case
The U.S. Supreme Court's 5-4 decision upholding class action waivers included in arbitration clauses of employment contracts has sent shockwaves through the class action bar.
May 23, 2018 at 07:00 AM
5 minute read
![](https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2018/05/unnamed-1-6.jpg)
About That SCOTUS Decision...
U.S. Supreme Court on Monday 5-4 ruling class action waivers arbitration agreements employment contracts. Marcia Coyle Law.com story opinion . wrote Gorsuch Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg trio of cases NLRB v. Murphy Oil USA Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis Ernst & Young v. Morris Federal Arbitration Act National Labor Relations Act.Here's what many on the plaintiffs' side had to say on Twitter:
➤ Lori Andrus Andrus Anderson ➤ Paul Bland Public Justice #SCOTUS #MurphyOil ➤ The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights http://bit.ly/2x0AS5Z #SCOTUS On the defense side Andrew Pincus Mayer Brown U.S. Chamber of Commerce Seyfarth Shaw Noah Finkel blog post The cases most affected Bloomberg this story Uber But there are limits California's Private Attorney General Act Susan Eisenberg Cozen O'Connor “The arbitration agreement itself still has to be enforceable under whatever the applicable law is. Employers have to ensure that their agreements do meet the laws under which they're trying to get them enforced. If the agreement is not enforceable, for whatever reason, you're back in court.”![](https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2018/05/unnamed-2-4.jpg)
Why This Pa. Judge Rejected a 'Bristol-Myers' Defense
Pennsylvania Ethicon 100 pelvic mesh cases U.S. Supreme Court Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California Law.com Max Mitchell here Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Arnold New Johnson & Johnson here May 18 opinion Secant Max told me Bristol-Myers “What I took away from the opinion is that New might not be drilling down quite as deeply as the defendants want in terms of how connected to the conduct the claims need to be in order to have jurisdiction. The defendants were drillingdown very deep into the nitty-gritty of specifically what pieces were manufactured by the Pa. company and whether those specific processes are the basis for the plaintiffs' claims. Judge New basically took a bit of a step back and said, the Pa. company was heavily involved in manufacturing the mesh andthe plaintiffs have specifically alleged defects regarding the mesh and its manufacturing, so there's a sufficient nexus between the conduct and the claims.”![](https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2018/05/unnamed-3-4.jpg)
Quinn Products Team Moves to Dechert
Mark Cheffo Sheila Birnbaum Quinn Emanuel Dechert Here Law.com Dan Packel Morgan Tovey Sandra Bresnick Douglas Fleming David Stern Hughes Hubbard & Reed hereWho Got the Work?
K&L Gates Baker McKenzie U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation railroad equipment makers April 3 settlement with the DOJ Thomas Birsic Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp Faiveley Transport North America Inc. Railroad Controls LP Mark Hamer Knorr-Bremse AG Knorr Brake Company LLC New York Air Brake LLCNo Hang-Ups Samsung its cell phones overheat and explode Here Law.com U.S. District Judge Michael Ponsor Daniel Levin Levin Sedran & Berman Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer Robert Katerberg Scorched Morgan & Morgan John Yanchunis Ryan McGee SunTrust Bank data breach Here Law.com Yahoo data breach Talc Verdicts Looming? Johnson & Johnson baby powder mesothelioma South Carolina here Motley Rice Willcox & Savage Nelson Mullins Imerys Talc America Rite Aid Simon Greenstone Panatier Bailey Crowe King & Spalding Nov. 16defense verdict. $117 million plaintiffs verdict
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Ex-Starbucks GC Exiting Latest Role, Will Get Severance
- 2Family Law Special Section 2025
- 3We Must Uphold the Rights of Immigrant Students
- 4Orrick Picks Up 13-Lawyer Tech, VC Group From Gunderson Dettmer
- 5How Alzheimer’s and Other Cognitive Diseases Affect Guardianship, POAs and Estate Planning
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250