What's Next: Max Schrems and Why Your Privacy Policy Still Doesn't Cut It
The inaugural day of the GDPR brought new data woes for Facebook and Google. But hey, maybe you can make some money off your data?
May 30, 2018 at 07:30 AM
4 minute read
➤➤ Want to receive What's Next straight to your inbox? Sign up here.
Your (Updated) Privacy Policy Still Doesn't Cut It.
Max Schrems (pictured), the Austrian privacy activist and lawyer, has never been one to shrink from a major legal battle over privacy he challenged that too blasted an opening salvo over Silicon Valley The complaints he filed against Google and Facebook in four different countries could carry more than 8 billion euros in penalties the complaints take direct aim at the GDPR compliance efforts by these companies Schrems is saying that under the GDPR, that whole approach doesn't cut it users only had the choice to delete the account or hit the 'agree' button If he's right on the law—even a little bit—it makes me wonder if a lot of other companies' privacy policies are vulnerable Facebook chief privacy officer Erin Egan Hogan Lovells attorney Eduardo Ustaran ComputerWeekly >> Takeaway: European Data Protection Board Max Schrems Photo: Lukas Beck 2014 (With Permission)Now That's an Idea...
Hacker News put all his Facebook data up for sale on eBay “Everyone else's making money off it, so why shouldn't I?” the biddingWho Can't Get Your Private Data?Criminal Defendants.
the California Supreme Court's decision last week Facebook v. Superior Court (Hunter): well, TBD nearly 60 pages to explain its reasoning Facebook, Instagram and Twitter data from a witness Section 2702 of the 1986 Stored Communications Act, To the extent the SCA impedes those rights, they maintain, the law should be declared unconstitutional. sent the case back down to the trial court with the directive that the parties suss out what they can find in the public data first cannot be resolved on this record >> Takeaway: Riana Pfefferkorn of Stanford Law School's Center for Internet and Society.Protocol: 'Sweeping' The Crypto Wild West
The Denver Post reports “Operation Cryptosweep.” “We have more investigations going,” Colorado Securities Commissioner Gerald Rome told the newspaper. May 21 press release The North American Securities Administrators Association, or NASAA. Its president, Joseph Borg, indicated the focus of the effort is on outright fraud schemes >> Think Ahead:Listen Up: Fear Not the Smart Contract
Aaron Wright Casey Kuhlman Stuart Popejoy Amir Azaran here Apple Podcasts Google Play LibsynDose of Dystopia
read this her Amazon device picked up a private conversation with her husband and transmitted it to a random contact this explanation “Echo woke up due to a word in background conversation sounding like 'Alexa,'” Amazon said in a statement. “Then, the subsequent conversation was heard as a 'send message' request. At which point, Alexa said out loud 'To whom?' At which point, the background conversation was interpreted as a name in the customer's contact list. Alexa then asked out loud, '[contact name], right?' Alexa then interpreted background conversation as 'right'. As unlikely as this string of events is, we are evaluating options to make this case even less likely.” Should Amazon be liable for apparent design flaws like this one, or are we responsible for inviting the listening devices into our homes?That's it for this week. Watch what you say out there!
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat's Next: Judge to Quash Twitter Subpoena | SCOTUS Won't Review Trial Ban
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1LexisNexis Announces Public Availability of Personalized AI Assistant Protégé
- 2Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
- 3Artificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
- 4The New Global M&A Kings All Have Something in Common
- 5Big Law Aims to Make DEI Less Divisive in Trump's Second Term
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250