Skilled in the Art: Fed Circuit Fireworks on Docket for Cisco, Allergan
Top advocates will be arguing at the appeals court next week in hot IP cases involving copyright protections for software and claims of tribal immunity in PTO proceedings.
June 01, 2018 at 01:55 PM
3 minute read
Skilled in the Art Scott Graham cri de coeur email me on Twitter ➤➤ Would you like to receive Skilled in the Art as an email? Sign up here.
|Get Ready for Fireworks at Federal Circuit
On your mark. Get set. ➤ Cisco Systems v. Arista Networks. Cisco one of the networking titan's last best shots its sprawling IP battle Arista looming antitrust action Google's bid for en banc review Oracle industry standards, interoperability, and the reviewability of "black box" jury verdicts Kathleen Sullivan of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan Keker, Van Nest & Peter's Bob Van Nest ➤ Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals. derisive commentary congressional bills Allergan use Native American tribal immunity as a shield from PTAB review of its patents ruled in February Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe the Supreme Court has consistently recognized tribal immunity in the absence of an explicit congressional waiver. Massey & Gail's Jonathan Massey Perkins Coie partner Eric Miller Mark Freeman ➤ Amarin v. ITC. Amarin Royal DSM King & Spalding partner Ashley Parrish Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe partner Mark Davies ITC attorney Houda Morad DOJ's Joseph Busa
|
Seeking a Higher Power on Section 101
Thursday patent eligibility law "needs clarification by higher authority." denial of en banc review of Berkheimer v. HP. the plurality en banc opinion Alice his critique of the Supreme Court's approach on Thursday to stick with Berkheimer here. 
|
SAS Prompting Earlier District Court Stays
SAS Insititute stay patent cases earlier in the IPR process Ropes & Gray partner Scott McKeown on the firm's Patents Post Grant blog
|
Lex Machina Dives Into Trade Secrets
Lex Machina reports Owen Byrd
That's all from Skilled in the Art for this week. I'll see you all again Tuesday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Global Lawyer: Big Law Walks a Tightrope But Herbert Smith Freehills Refuses to Lose Its Footing
8 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
