Skilled in the Art: Federal Circuit, PTAB Plot Path Forward after SAS Ruling
The U.S. Supreme Court's SAS ruling ruling didn't address what happens to pending appeals from PTAB judgements that are now not considered complete.
June 08, 2018 at 11:56 AM
3 minute read
Skilled in the Art Scott Graham SAS Institute AbbVie Boehringer Ingelheim Cisco Systems Oracle v. Google email me on Twitter ➤➤ Would you like to receive Skilled in the Art as an email? Sign up here.
|Picking Up the Pieces of SAS
SAS Institute opinion it might as well have come with a big bag of jigsaw puzzle pieces snapped a big piece into place PGS Geophysical v. Iancu though it looks as if the last few are being jammed into place. SAS What happens to pending appeals from PTAB judgments that now turn out to have been incomplete? Federal Circuit Judge Richard Taranto PGS Geophysical Oil States SAS the PTAB has been unequivocal in its guidance AIA Section 325(d) seems to specifically refer to the decision to institute Baker Botts partner Eliot Williams SAS
|
Are AbbVie's Humira Hands Unclean?
upheld Gilead Sciences' unclean hands defense spectacularly bad facts Merck & Co Boehringer Ingelheim AbbVie Tom McParland reports U.S. Magistrate Judge Richard Lloret Paul Hastings Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr his discovery order
|
Who Got the Work?
Dominion Harbor a splash last year Eastman Kodak Co subsidiary Monument Peak Ventures , hat tip: RPX Corp SZ DJI Technology largest manufacturer of recreational drones Feinberg Day Alberti Lim & Belloli Morrison & Foerster U.S. District Judge Gary Klausner ➤ The dispute: ➤ The attorneys: veteran player litigation campaigns Elizabeth Day, David Alberti, Sal Lim Marc Belloli Bryan Wilson Hector Gallegos Lily Li Jackie Cheng Guy Ruttenberg Ruttenberg IP Law
|
Cisco Wants to Build on Oracle v. Google
copyright academia are copyrightable Cisco Systems Arista Networks I reported Wednesday Oracle v. Google Oracle v. Google Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan partner Kathleen Sullivan Judge Timothy Dyk
|
Velcro Video: The Sequel
Velcro Cos. This time original viral video Caroline Spiezio reports.
That's all from Skilled in the Art this week. I'll see you all again on Tuesday.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Skilled in the Art With Scott Graham: I'm So Glad We Had This Time Together
Design Patent Appeal Splinters Federal Circuit Panel + Susman Scores $163M Jury Verdict + Finnegan Protects Under Armour's House
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
