Yes, Counselor, You'll Retire Someday. Avoid These Financial Pitfalls Now.
As a lawyer, you like to think about what's next. You spend your career climbing the ladder from first-year associate to income partner to equity partner. But have you spent enough time thinking about life after the law?
June 20, 2018 at 11:21 AM
6 minute read
As a lawyer, you like to think about what's next. You spend your career climbing the ladder from first-year associate to income partner to equity partner. But have you spent enough time thinking about life after the law and, importantly, how you're going to pay for that life after the law? It's likely you've at least thought about retirement, but taking a proactive, planning-based approach, especially at the start of your career, is another story. Here are some common retirement planning pitfalls that lawyers often experience. Do any of these sound familiar?
Waiting too long to start planning. You're not going to sell your legal business and ride off into the sunset like your business-owner clients. A large, retirement-securing liquidity event is not in your cards, so time is truly of the essence. You have a limited number of years to maximize your savings, and the longer you wait to start planning the more pressure you will put on yourself in the later stages of your career.
If you're early in your career, start by taking advantage of the retirement plans your firm makes available to you. If you're not currently maxing out your contributions, set a goal for getting to that point by increasing your contribution percentage each quarter until you hit the maximum.
If you're later in your career, take heart—there's hope. You may need some help to run this calculation, but start by figuring out how much you need to put away between now and your ideal retirement age to maintain your preferred lifestyle. Hopefully that figure is realistic. If not, you could instead solve for a sustainable spending number that will ensure you don't run out of money and make the necessary lifestyle adjustments over time to hit that spending number by the time you reach retirement age. As a (usually) last resort, you could potentially work longer.
Bottom line is, the sooner you start planning, the more desirable your options will be.
Thinking your portfolio is enough. There's no question that your investment portfolio is a critically important component of your retirement. The assets you work hard to save over the years will be the main funding mechanism to finance your life after the law. However, your portfolio alone is not enough to give you complete confidence that you will be able to sustain your desired lifestyle throughout retirement. It's easy to say, “I've got $X million in my portfolio, I'll be fine.” However, without a clear handle on other key data points, you actually have no idea whether that will be enough.
Start by building a set of retirement planning assumptions that you can use to project how long your money will last. For example, consider the following factors:
- How long you will work. This factor can vary greatly for lawyers, depending on your partnership agreement and health. If you're a partner at a firm with some version of mandatory retirement, you may have very little control over how long you work. Other firms have more flexible agreements, allowing partners to work for as long as they are able. The impact of this factor is enormous. Working just one to two more years and not tapping into your portfolio for those years can significantly change the likelihood of your money lasting.
- How much you spend. Seems so obvious, right? You would think most people would have a crystal-clear understanding of their monthly spending rate. However, as lawyers advance throughout their careers and compensation increases, they often lose track of their monthly cash burn. Do you know how much you spend each month, to within $1,000? If not, look at your last few credit card statements and figure it out. It is impossible to know how large your portfolio needs to be at retirement without knowing what it costs to finance your lifestyle.
There are certainly other assumptions that need to be hashed out in projecting how long your money will last, but these two are a great starting point.
Relying only on firm-sponsored retirement plans. Law firms have traditionally done a great job of providing quality firm-sponsored retirement plans, and in turn lawyers typically do a good job of maxing out their contributions to these plans. It's common for law firms to even offer multiple firm-sponsored plans.
A growing trend in the legal community is seeing more firms adopt a defined benefit plan, such as a cash balance plan, to complement their existing 401(k) plans. These plans can significantly increase the amount that lawyers are able to sock away each year in tax-deferred retirement savings, in some cases well north of $100,000 each year.
While these firm-sponsored plans are great savings vehicles, they all have one very important trait in common: contribution limits. There is only so much you can save into these plans, like it or not. The critical question is whether the combined savings into all your retirement plans will be enough to fund your entire retirement? Very often the answer is no. Depending on your spending habits, your retirement plan savings may only fund a fraction of your retirement.
So, what's the solution? After-tax savings. As I wrote in a Law.com article earlier this year, lawyers should figure out “the number,” which is the annual after-tax savings target needed to give themselves a high probability of a successful retirement. This is savings to a brokerage or trust account above and beyond your firm-sponsored plans. A financial planner can help you figure out what that number should be and help you build a plan for hitting the target.
Important Disclosure: Investments involve risk, and past performance may not be indicative of future results. Balasa Dinverno Foltz LLC (BDF) investment and wealth management strategy recommendations may not be profitable, suitable or equal historical performance. BDF's current written disclosure statement discussing advisory services and fees is available for review at www.BDFLLC.com or upon request.
Justin Peacock is an owner and wealth manager at BDF, a wealth management firm based in the Chicago area with assets under management in excess of $4 billion. He leads the firm's attorney practice group and can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Eighth Circuit Determines No Standing for Website User Concerned With Privacy Who Challenged Session-Replay Technology Eighth Circuit Determines No Standing for Website User Concerned With Privacy Who Challenged Session-Replay Technology](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2022/08/Eighth-Circuit-Court-of-Appeals-767x633.jpg)
Eighth Circuit Determines No Standing for Website User Concerned With Privacy Who Challenged Session-Replay Technology
7 minute read![The Time Is Now for Employers to Assess Risk of Employees’ Use of DeepSeek The Time Is Now for Employers to Assess Risk of Employees’ Use of DeepSeek](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/57/33/fafb5fba4638b1b02819a934f854/deepseek-app-6-767x633.jpg)
The Time Is Now for Employers to Assess Risk of Employees’ Use of DeepSeek
4 minute read![Avoiding the Great Gen AI Wrecking Ball: Ignore AI’s Transformative Power at Your Own Risk Avoiding the Great Gen AI Wrecking Ball: Ignore AI’s Transformative Power at Your Own Risk](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/d4/5b/85f665cc49f58ab3501db221af0d/catherine-kemnitz-767x633.jpg)
Avoiding the Great Gen AI Wrecking Ball: Ignore AI’s Transformative Power at Your Own Risk
6 minute read![Building an Ownership Mindset as a Gen Z Junior Associate Building an Ownership Mindset as a Gen Z Junior Associate](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/97/1c/820ec59f4ab4802f29bb9cdf386a/contemplation-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1New York State Authorizes Stand-Alone Business Interruption Insurance Policies
- 2Buyer Beware: Continuity of Coverage in Legal Malpractice Insurance
- 3‘Listen, Listen, Listen’: Some Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 4BCLP Joins Saudi Legal Market with Plans to Open Two Offices
- 5White & Case Crosses $4M in PEP, $3B in Revenue in 'Breakthrough Year'
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250