Government Brexit department spends £1.2m on legal advice in first quarter of 2018-19
Department for Exiting the EU turns to "more efficient and cheaper" government legal team
June 29, 2018 at 05:25 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Department for Exiting the European Union (DExEU) spent £1.2m on legal advice from the Government Legal Department (GLD) in the first quarter of the 2018-19 financial year.
The figure was published yesterday (28 June) as part of the government department's transparency data report, which includes any spending over £25,000.
DExEU paid GLD, the government's principal legal advisers, £1,191,250 during the period from April to June 2018. The payment was made on 4 May.
A spokesperson for DExEU said: "We are working to unpick more than 40 years of legal harmonisation with the European Union. To do this effectively, we are making full use of the government's internal legal services. This is considerably more efficient and cheaper than going to the open market."
GLD is a non-ministerial department, meaning it is led by senior civil servants and does not operate under direct political oversight.
The report also shows DExEU spent £85,724 on "travel and subsistence" services from Clarity Travel Management during the quarter, as well as £95,704 on estates and facilities expenses.
Last year, Legal Week reported that DExEU spent £3.7m on legal costs during the last financial year, including more than £1.2m on Brexit-related litigation. Legal costs represented DExEU's second most significant area of spending, behind staff costs of £14m for the year ending 31 March 2017.
Litigation costs represented almost a third of the department's total legal spend during the year, with the bulk of the £1.2m in litigation costs relating to the high-profile Article 50 legal challenge led by investment manager Gina Miller. The remainder of the litigation costs (£78,000) related to Article 127 litigation, which concerns Britain's membership of the European Economic Area.
The two legal challenges cost the department £345,000 in legal fees, £383,000 in counsel fees and disbursements, and £493,000 in court-ordered third-party litigation costs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoodwin to Launch Brussels Office With Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner
3 minute readDespite Brexit, UK Lawyers Still Dominate on Big EU Antitrust Lawsuits
7 minute readHow to Litigate Before the EU’s Top Court, the European Court of Justice
5 minute readSemiconductor Component Maker Accused of Deceiving Investors About Market Downturn, Export Curbs
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts Grapple With The Corporate Transparency Act
- 2FTC Chair Lina Khan Sues John Deere Over 'Right to Repair,' Infuriates Successor
- 3‘Facebook’s Descent Into Toxic Masculinity’ Prompts Stanford Professor to Drop Meta as Client
- 4Pa. Superior Court: Sorority's Interview Notes Not Shielded From Discovery in Lawsuit Over Student's Death
- 5Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250