Madoff Trustee Passes Milestone as Baker & Hostetler Fees Near $1B
As Irving Picard approaches 10 years on the job as trustee of funds recovered for Bernie Madoff's victims, he and his firm are getting closer to securing $1 billion in fees from the work.
July 05, 2018 at 03:22 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Almost a decade into his role as trustee of funds recovered for victims of Bernard Madoff's notorious Ponzi scheme, Irving Picard and his law firm, Baker & Hostetler, have passed another milestone—securing more than $13 billion for Madoff victims in light of a $280 million settlement approved this week. And Picard's firm is still racking up fees from the work, securing an award in April that brought its total to just shy of $1 billion, with another fee award likely to hit next month.
In a statement Thursday, Picard and his team announced the court approval of a settlement with Madoff “feeder funds”—investment funds that funneled money into Madoff's Ponzi scheme—tied to money manager J. Ezra Merkin. Merkin and the funds, Ascot Partners LP, Ascot Fund Ltd. and Gabriel Capital Corp., had agreed in June to pay $280 million in a settlement with Picard, who since late-2008 has served as the Securities Investor Protection Act trustee for Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (BLMIS).
With a federal bankruptcy court's approval of the Merkin settlement, Picard has now recovered more than $13.26 billion for Madoff's victims, or about 75 percent of the estimated $17.5 billion in losses from Madoff victims who filed claims, the trustee's team said. Those recovered funds have all gone directly to Madoff customers, while the Securities Investor Protection Corp. has covered administrative costs related to the recovery efforts, as well as trustee, legal and accounting fees.
“At the start of this recovery initiative nearly 10 years ago, we were determined to recover as much as possible for Madoff's victims, but we were not sure how much we could recover,” Picard said in Thursday's statement. “Thanks to the wonderful performance of our teams and the backing of SIPC, we have achieved unprecedented success—recovery of over $13.26 billion—for those whose funds were stolen by Madoff. It's an exceptional outcome for Madoff's victims, many of whom didn't expect to get any of their stolen funds returned.”
As large as the recoveries have been for Madoff's customers, the trustee work has also proved lucrative for Picard and Baker & Hostetler, a firm Picard joined from Gibbons shortly after a court appointed him to the trustee position.
In all, the firm has been awarded a total of $992.72 million in fees, with the latest interim fee approval—for $30.7 million, covering the four months from Aug. 1, 2017, to Nov. 30, 2017—coming in late April.
Picard and the firm have typically filed interim fee applications every four months, and usually, they've been approved by a federal bankruptcy judge in New York about a month after they were submitted. The next fee application is expected in mid-July, meaning that Picard and Baker & Hostetler could see their total fee awards surpass $1 billion by mid-to-late August.
Baker & Hostetler partner David Sheehan, who has served as lead counsel to Picard during the Madoff recovery efforts and had a hand in steering the work to Baker & Hostetler, stated that he expects the work will continue.
In a recent semiannual progress report covering a period through March 31, 2018, Picard and his team wrote that they “continued to litigate hundreds of individual cases” in federal bankruptcy court, district court and appeals courts in the United States, and in dozens of international courts.
Included in the trustee's summary of litigation were 16 feeder fund cases that remained pending as of March 31. At least one of those—the Merkin litigation—has since settled, however.
“Our work is not done,” Sheehan said. “We continue to pursue many avenues on behalf of Madoff's victims, and look forward to returning even more in stolen funds back to Madoff's victims as we pass additional, significant milestones in the future.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readTopping Big Law, Litigation Firm the Latest to Dole Out Above-Market Bonuses
3 minute readBoies Schiller Increases Federal Clerkship Bonus to $150K Amid Hiring Uptick
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250