Dechert applies to US court to subpoena Sunday Times journalist after ENRC leak allegation
US law firm follows mining company in applying to subpoena journalist for leaked documents
July 10, 2018 at 07:28 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Dechert has taken legal action in the US to gain access to documents obtained by a Sunday Times journalist after the law firm was accused by its former client, Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation (ENRC), of leaking confidential information to the newspaper.
The US firm has applied to subpoena US West Coast correspondent Danny Fortson for documents that are "directly relevant" to an anticipated claim against the firm by ENRC, after the mining company alleged that the journalist was leaked "highly confidential" information by Dechert.
The court filing states that the documents relate to a "a letter written by Dechert to ENRC that was leaked to Fortson, the contents of which was reflected in articles he wrote that were published in The Sunday Times". ENRC has said it is "reasonably likely" to bring claims against Dechert in the UK with regards to the letter.
The articles Fortson wrote for the Sunday Times on the contents of the letter set out allegations that ENRC had "falsified and destroyed" documents, used "electronic wiping tools", and made "payments to African presidents".
The application comes after ENRC successfully applied to subpoena Fortson for the same documents in April this year.
Dechert's application states that it "strongly disputes that it leaked the letter" and requests access to "documents that it [ENRC] may seek from Mr Fortson" in order that it has "the same evidence that ENRC does".
The dispute dates back to 2011, when Dechert took a lead role on an internal investigation into allegations of corruption at an ENRC subsidiary. Global white-collar co-head Neil Gerrard brought over the mandate to the firm when he joined from DLA Piper earlier that year. Dechert was fired by ENRC in March 2013 in an "acrimonious" split and subsequently made allegations of misconduct based on confidential information provided to the firm by ENRC while it was a client.
The firm has asked that it can take its own testimony from Fortson, as well as an additional set of documents relating to the source for the The Sunday Times articles, including "any document that refers to the letter from Dechert to ENRC that was later leaked".
The application was filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California late last month, under the names of Dechert New York white-collar partner Benjamin Rosenberg and San Francisco managing partner Joseph Escher. A spokesperson for the firm said: "We have submitted our own application before the California court as we too would like to know the source of the April 2013 leak to The Sunday Times."
In the filing, the firm states that its intention is that through "limited discovery" of documents in Fortson's possession, it intends to prove that it "was not the source of the leak to Mr Forston and did not violate its duty to safeguard ENRC's confidential information".
ENRC, which denies the claims in the letter, alleged in its subpoena application that the information was leaked by Dechert based on the fact that it was "highly confidential" and "only a limited number of people had access to it". ENRC alleges that Dechert "had an apparent motive to leak the letter after it was terminated" by the company.
Charles Harder and Dilan Esper of US law firm Harder are representing ENRC, while Escher is the lead lawyer for Dechert.
ENRC is also currently battling with the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) at the High Court, in a case that could have significant implications for legal privilege in the UK.
ENRC is appealing a High Court decision in May last year that communications and advice to ENRC by Dechert during the firm's investigation should be turned over to the SFO. ENRC is disputing the decision that Dechert's investigation was not covered by legal privilege.
The Sunday Times was contacted for comment.
Photo credit: Howard Lake
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Under Fire for Human Rights Assessment of Saudi Arabia World Cup Bid
5 minute readThe Week in Data Nov. 7: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Trump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250