Critical Mass: Class Action Lawyers Searching for Clues to Kavanaugh's Approach. Plus, RoundUp Cancer Claim Goes to Trial
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's history of dialing back the prerogatives of federal agencies could be a harbinger of a restrictive approach to class actions, some lawyers say.
July 11, 2018 at 12:58 PM
5 minute read
Critical Mass Law.com Amanda Bronstad Brett Kavanaugh U.S. Supreme Court cancer trial Monsanto RoundUp “no stacking” [email protected] @abronstadlaw. ➤➤ Would you like to receive Critical Mass as an email? Sign up here. 
|
What Kavanaugh Might Mean for Class Actions
President Donald Trump U.S. Supreme Court Brett Kavanaugh Tony Mauro Law.com here here Sept. 29 decision Thomas Gorman Dorsey & Whitney Barron this story) Kavanaugh's dissent U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Here's the case Lorenzo v. Securities and Exchange Commission here 2-1 opinion false statements shouldn't be liable at all “If the SEC's view on 'scheme liability' under Section 10(b) is sustained it not only eases the burden of proof for the agency in its cases, it would permit class action lawyers to expand the reach of their cases to include a larger group of defendants. That would be very significant for the class action bar.” 
|
Trial Starts in Case Against Monsanto
Monsanto Co RoundUp summary coverage opening statements Monday scientific studies regulatory actions glyphosate R. Brent Wisner Baum Hedlund Dewayne “Lee” Johnson, George Lombardi Winston & Strawn Then there's this U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria Ross Todd Law.com here It wasn't exactly a glowing endorsement 
|
No Stacking of Class Actions ... But Piling On?
U.S. Supreme Court stacking of class actions A quick backgrounder Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg China Agritech v. Resh Marcia Coyle here Law.com big win for the defense bar Not so fast Christine Reilly Manatt, Phelps & Phillips “An argument was raised in that case that it could lead to more class action complaints being filed. What they mean by that is if you know you cannot keep bringing these cases once the statute of limitations expires, there may be a motivation or incentive for plaintiff lawyers to get their case in before the statute of limitations expires. Whether that is actually going to happen is a second question.” 
|
Green Light for VW Settlement
9th Circuit Volkswagen emissions settlement Law.com Ross Todd here U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer deal $10 billion much-ballyhooed 9th Circuit decision In re Hyundai and Kia Fuel Economy Standards here here threatened to unravel the Volkswagen settlement footnote In re Hyundai & Kia Fuel Economy Litigation
|
Who Got the Work?
Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc. Steve Bennett Faegre Baker Daniels 22 lawsuits M/L Taper U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation U.S. District Judge Donovan Frank Stryker Durom Cup hip settled
Talc Countdown talcum powder Johnson & Johnson 22 women Closing arguments Wednesday possible verdict Friday Here Courtroom View Network here Donziger Suspended New York appeals court Steven Donziger U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan $8.6 billion judgment Chevron Corp. Law.com here Risperdal Review Pennsylvania Supreme Court thousands of lawsuits Risperdal Law.com here Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Arnold New Janssen Pharmaceuticals Testosterone Toss: “low-testosterone” treatment Here U.S. District Judge Matthew Kennelly $150 million verdict $3.2 million AbbVie findings to be inconsistent
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Trending Stories
- 1Nelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
- 2Immunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
- 3How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 4Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 5Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
