Q&A: Baker McKenzie's Newly Hired 'Godfather' of Legal Operations
After pioneering legal operations at Aon Corp. and Archer Daniels Midland, David Cambria has taken his experience to a law firm for the first time.
July 13, 2018 at 01:02 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
David Cambria. The Godfather most recently emerging trend How do law firms benefit from having a “voice of the client” as part of their leadership team? There's a whole dynamic that happens between the law department and the C-suite, there's a whole dynamic that happens between the law department and the finance function, and the law department and the business function, where it's hard to understand the nuance of what you read about, or what you hear about, or what your clients are telling you. It actually brings a third dimension, and it brings it to life, in a way that—until you've lived it—it's hard to appreciate. How far along is this trend of hiring legal operations directors from the client side? It's fairly new, and I think in a large part because it takes a certain mindset—I think, a very open mindset—to bring in someone from in-house into a law firm to really start aligning the resources to the needs of the client. Legal operations is a topic getting a lot of airtime these days, but the reality of it is a bunch of us have been doing this a long time, 20 years or so. So you do tend to have varying degrees of readiness and sophistication from the legal operations side to actually start making that transition over to a law firm. While you see the number of legal operations folks growing on the in-house side, a lot of those folks are actually fairly new to the space and probably working through some of the things that more senior folks have addressed earlier in their career. The talent pool is a little smaller. Archer Daniels Midland also has operations spread around the world. The businesses are in two different industries, but are there any similarities between the two? Absolutely. I would say the complexity in different parts of the world—understanding how to address those complexities and realizing that the solutions that you have, while they may work in one part of the world, might not work in another—is a key component. Because you are on global platform and in a global organization, all of the workings of the world affect you in one way or another and impact the way you do business or deliver legal services. While we were at ADM, that was a focus of review for us, something you always had to consider in delivering legal services. At a firm like Baker, I think they have very similar concerns and things they look over and watch over. What do practicing lawyers need to know about legal operations? People tend to talk about legal operations as a role within the company, rather than a multi-disciplinary field where professionals collaborate to design and build systems to manage legal problems. Is there a degree of stubbornness that you have to overcome? No. Certainly there is inertia that you have to overcome in thinking about legal service delivery, but there is a massive amount of willingness and desire on both in-house and the law firm to figure out what that means and how to do that adeptly and in a way that's providing value. What do you expect the landscape for global firms to look like 10 years in the future? Their expertise, their capabilities are going to be what drives people to a firm like Baker to solve very complicated problems. The lawyers will really focus, at a global law firm, as legal integrators. [The concept was pioneered by consultant Bill Mooz and Indiana University Law professor Bill Henderson.] Legal integrators design systems and solutions. They pull together bespoke lawyers at the firm They help and run manage systems, and by systems, I don't just mean technology systems but really models that help deliver legal services. And they also pull into the mix legal specialists and subject matter expertise based on specific tasks, or allied professionals around data and processing and software technology. I think a global firm that manages those pieces and helps pull those all together is what the global firm of the future is going to look like.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250