Freshfields, Pinsents and DLA among 27 to make the grade on Pearson's new-look panel
FTSE 100 company rejigs panel into 'preferred' and 'general' rosters
July 23, 2018 at 12:55 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Pinsent Masons, DLA Piper and Fieldfisher are among 27 firms to have won places on FTSE 100 publishing and education group Pearson's new legal panel, following a review led by general counsel Bjarne Tellmann.
In a move away from its previous arrangement, the company has restructured its panel into two distinct parts – a 'preferred' list comprised of 14 firms, and a separate 'general' list of 13 firms.
The preferred firms will deal with day-to-day matters and areas not previously covered by Pearson's panels – including US immigration, employment litigation and patent work – while the 'general' roster will help the company meet its other legal needs.
The preferred panel includes Freshfields, Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF), DWF, Charles Russell Speechlys and Fieldfisher, as well as US firms Morgan Lewis & Bockius and Littler Mendelson, while the general panel includes Pinsents, DLA Piper, Bird & Bird and US firms Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton and Sullivan & Cromwell, among others.
Freshfields, HSF, Pinsents, DLA Piper and Fieldfisher are all reappointments, having won places on the company's first-ever legal panel in 2015.
The panel review was part of what Pearson called a wider effort to "simplify its business, become leaner and more agile and realign Pearson's use of legal resources most effectively". In assembling the new panel, the company said it considered a combination of factors including value and strong cost management, firm experience, strength of team, flexibility in billing and diversity.
Tellmann (pictured), the British Legal Awards 2017 GC of the Year, was assisted in the review by Michael McQueeney, deputy general counsel, and Karen Abraham, senior counsel and vice-president.
Of the review, he said: "Running a periodic review is also good business practice, ensuring we have the scaffolding in place to help Pearson achieve its strategic objectives as well as maximise value and meet budgets. This process ensures Pearson has a range of trusted partners to provide high-quality counsel for us as we navigate through the digital transformation."
Preferred panel in full
Ballard Spahr Charles Russell Speechyls DWF Fieldfisher Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Goodwin Procter Herbert Smith Freehills Jackson Lewis Kilkpatrick Townsend & Stockton Littler Mendelson Morgan Lewis & Bockius Nielsen Merksamer Parrinelo Gross & Leoni Oppenheim + Zebrak Quarles & Brady
General panel in full
Bird & Bird Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton Davis Wright Tremaine DLA Piper Dorsey & Whitney Gray Plant Mooty Kemp Little Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler Pinsent Masons Shapiro Arato Steptoe Johnson Sullivan & Cromwell Woodhouse
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Not a Shield, but a Weapon? Blue Cross Accused of Antitrust Practices
2 minute read
Uber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
5 minute read
Ballooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
Trending Stories
- 1Trying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
- 2The Distribution of Dangerous Products Via Online Marketplaces
- 3The Products Liability Case Against Tianeptine: The Deadly ‘Dietary Supplement’ Found at Your Local Store
- 4The Evolving Landscape of Joint and Several Liability in Pa.: A Post-'Spencer' Analysis
- 5A Deep Dive Into the Product-Line Exception in Pennsylvania
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
