Skilled in the Art: Lyft Picks Up a New Patent Suit | Plus, Another Federal Circuit Judge Says Enough on Section 101
Kasowitz Benson Torres founder and managing partner Marc Kasowitz are representing the latest plaintiff to go after the ride-sharing company.
July 24, 2018 at 09:00 PM
3 minute read
Skilled in the Art Scott Graham cri de coeur email me on Twitter
➤➤ Would you like to receive Skilled in the Art as an email? Click here. Or subscribe to our new RSS feed.
|
Taken for a Ride on Lyft Suit
Lyft being sued Stephen Dickerson who says patented the idea the '730 patent the complaint Marc Kasowitz when is Lyft not being sued for patent infringement? Eclipse IP Leigh Rothschild Blackbird Tech Shipping and Transit Hailo Technologies Uber U.S. Patent 5,973,619 Unified Patents including a 1978 patent. Nineteen seventy freakin' eight! 40-year-old patent instituted IPR proceedings maybe Professor Dickerson's focus on “an automated system for providing unified billing” will prove harder to invalidate Alice motion |
Federal Circuit Picking Up the Pace
Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe v. Mylan can't shield patents from inter partes review at the PTO. Judge Kimberly Moore Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe' arguments last month the mixed signals the Supreme Court has been sending about IPR Justice Clarence Thomas Oil States Justice Stephen Breyer Cuozzo Ropes & Gray counsel Matt Rizzolo has applied sovereign immunity Justice Kavanaugh will tip the balance toward the SAS-it's-civil-litigation take on IPRs Oil States/Cuozzo Perkins Coie; Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati; Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox Sughrue Mion LSI Corp ruled in December
|
Judge Plager Offers the Latest Section 101 Critique
Federal Circuit Judge Alan Lourie Lourie wrote Berkheimer v. HP Judge Pauline Newman Senior Judge Richard Linn a concurring opinion last fall Senior Judge Jay Plager a concurring opinion Interval Licensing v. AOL Alice/Mayo said from the bench Chief Judge Bob Mayer a 2016 opinion.
|
Correction
I wrote about Judge Susan Illston Illumina-Ariosa Eve v. Mentor Graphics Synopsys Inc. Mentor settled the case first raised SAS
That's all from Skilled in the Art today. I'll see you all again on Friday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkilled in the Art With Scott Graham: I'm So Glad We Had This Time Together
Design Patent Appeal Splinters Federal Circuit Panel + Susman Scores $163M Jury Verdict + Finnegan Protects Under Armour's House
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250