Law firms will suffer Brexit pain unless government acts now, City leader warns
City of London policy chair warns law firms over expected 12,000 Brexit-related job losses
July 27, 2018 at 08:45 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The City is set to lose up to 12,000 jobs in the wake of Brexit and UK law firms will "absolutely" feel the effects, the City of London Corporation's policy chair, Catherine McGuinness, has told Legal Week.
Speaking after giving evidence at a parliamentary committee evidence session on Brexit earlier this week (24 July), McGuinness warned of the dangers to law firms of a 'no-deal' Brexit.
In the EU Select Committee oral evidence session on the progress of the Brexit negotiations, McGuinness spoke of the hit that the £188bn professional services sector could take if the UK Government fails to agree a withdrawal agreement that takes its needs into account.
Talking to Legal Week specifically about the impact on law firms, she said: "Absolutely, law firms could feel the effects [of possible job losses in financial services]. It of course depends on each firm's arrangement and how they're set up, but there needs to be mutual recognition of qualifications and greater certainty around mobility of people."
McGuinness – herself a former partner at Fieldfisher predecessor firm Waterhouse & Co – highlighted an urgent need for the government to ensure that the planned transition period is ratified and to deal with issues such as contract continuity, passporting rights and mutual recognition of professional qualifications.
"The government needs to underscore the importance of recognising professional business services, including law, in the agreement," she said, adding: "I am a former lawyer, and when I talk about professional services, often I'm talking about law firms, and have English law in mind, in particular the mutual recognition of judgments and enforceability.
"Customers want certainty – for example, the ability to rely on the enforceability of a judgment, which is in the interest of business parties across the EU. And for law firms, what's particularly important is mobility of people – what will happen to the international talent pool on which firms rely, and the ability of lawyers to fly in and out to advise clients."
Her warning comes after the publication of a letter from the Professional & Business Services Council, which represents professions including law, accounting, consultancy, architecture and advertising, calling on Theresa May to act immediately to protect the interests of professional business services in the Brexit negotiations.
In the letter sent earlier this month, 42 business leaders, including Allen & Overy senior partner Wim Dejonghe, Clifford Chance managing partner Matthew Layton, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer senior partner Edward Braham, Slaughter and May senior partner Steve Cooke and Herbert Smith Freehills senior partner Jamer Palmer, list seven key demands from the government to protect their businesses.
These include: the mutual recognition of professional qualifications, judgments and regulatory frameworks; maintaining an ability to continue recruiting the best talent from the EU and beyond; greater certainty during the transition period; and the ability to continue providing fly-in, fly-out advice.
The letter highlights the contribution the professional services sector makes to the UK economy – providing some 4.6 million jobs and £188bn in gross value. Last year, the Law Society valued the legal sector's contribution at about £27.5bn.
McGuinness, who also signed the letter, said City law firms have "stepped up to play their part" in negotiations. She highlighted Braham's work as leader of the Mutual Market Access Working Group, which looks to underline the importance of maintaining mutual market access for legal services across the UK and EU.
With fewer than 250 days until Brexit (29 March 2019), McGuinness stressed that there remain a number of urgent issues that need to be dealt with to ensure the UK legal system remains attractive. "English law is one of our greatest assets, and this must be underpinned in the agreement," she said.
In addition to urging firms to continue to push the government to meet the sector's needs, McGuinness also warned that firms need to prepare themselves internally for Brexit.
"For law firms, there will be a lot of work around [Brexit] in the immediate aftermath. But they will all need to think about what arrangements they must put in place in the long term."
Photo credit: Alex Merz Photography
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Under Fire for Human Rights Assessment of Saudi Arabia World Cup Bid
5 minute readThe Week in Data Nov. 7: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Trump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250