Ahead of the Curve: Law Journals Innovating? Believe It.
Let's be honest: Law reviews and journals aren't exactly cutting-edge vanguards, but some are breaking new ground, both in their approach to content and in their subject matter.
July 31, 2018 at 11:25 AM
3 minute read
Welcome back to Ahead of the Curve. I'm Karen Sloan , legal education editor at Law.com, and I'll be your host for this weekly look at innovation and notable developments in legal education. Not signed up yet to get Ahead of the Curve sent to your inbox each week? Go here. law journals that are breaking new ground Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics Yale University and its law students University of California at Los Angeles' disability law journal University of Missouri—Kansas City School of Law Professor Allen Rostron Please share your thoughts and feedback with me at [email protected] or on Twitter:@KarenSloanNLJ
|Let's Get Current…And Interdisciplinary
Nick Werle Yale Law School former Mexican president Ernesto Zedillo “We Can't Go Cold Turkey: Why Suppressing Drug Markets Endangers Society,” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. summer edition centered on the opioid crisis is notable this special online collaboration Yale and Stanford Law School director of Yale's Center for the Study of Globalization Yale law professor Abbe Gluck The takeaway: But I wondered whether it could be replicated with other topics and on other law campuses. More than 60 students wanted in on the 20-seat opioid crisis seminar.
|Disability Law? There's a Journal For That
announcement University of California at Los Angeles School of Law that it was launching the nation's first journal devoted to disability law. Disability Law Journal at UCLA law student Sunney Poyner who is the journal's first editor in chief The Takeaway:
|
“I Said Times New Roman!”
Harvard Law Review Yale Law Journal Columbia Law Review Nancy Levit and Allen Rostron's law review submission database University of Missouri–Kansas City School of Law University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review Appalachian Journal of Law Barry Law Review Idaho Law Review
|
Extra Credit Reading
Their numbers are dwindling John Marshall Law School Stephen McDaniel headed to court American Constitution Society new competition Orin Kerr's dispatch
[email protected]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Trending Stories
- 1LexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
- 2'Everything Leaves a Digital Footprint': How to Navigate the Complexities of Internal Investigations
- 3Baker McKenzie Accepts Defeat on Australian Integration With Firm's Asia Practice
- 4PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
- 5The Dynamic Duo Behind CMG's Legal Ops Team
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
